VirusTotal
3 / 95 engine detections
Raporu aç“Cyber Investigations : Specialized Recovery Firm”
Kripto yatırım dolandırıcılığı: cyberinvestigations.online — İçerik kullanılamıyor. Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 3/95 (alphaMountain.ai, CyRadar, Fortinet)…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
3 / 95 engine detections
Raporu aç1/100
Raporu açDBL_SPAM
1 community reference
Raporu açprovider verdict: clean
Raporu açNo threat flag
Raporu açPage capture
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain cyberinvestigations.online was created on 15 October 2025 and is currently taken offline. Registration was processed by PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com, and the authoritative name servers are ns1.monovm.host and ns2.monovm.host. DNS resolution maps the domain to IP address 146.70.118.226, which belongs to AS9009 (M247 Europe SRL) and is geolocated in Germany. No TLS certificate is presented, indicating that the site does not offer encrypted HTTPS connections.
The page title returned from the host is "Cyber Investigations : Specialized Recovery Firm," which does not reference the targeted brand. The domain explicitly impersonates the financial brand Argent, and Scamadviser assigns a trust score of 1 / 100, classifying the activity as an investment scam. The domain is listed on a single security blocklist and is actively blocked by PhishDestroy. Malware and phishing detection services on VirusTotal flagged the domain in three out of ninety‑five scanners, and AlienVault OTX references the domain in one threat intelligence pulse.
These indicators collectively suggest a low‑cost impersonation campaign aimed at luring victims into fraudulent investment schemes. Uncertainty remains regarding the exact payload or phishing kit used, as no page content beyond the title has been captured and no SSL certificate limits further protocol‑level analysis. Defenders should continue to block the domain at perimeter filters, monitor DNS queries for the associated name servers, and add the IP address to host‑based deny lists. Additional telemetry such as web traffic logs and endpoint alerts should be reviewed for any attempts to contact this domain before it was taken offline.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.monovm.hostns2.monovm.hostLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='cyberinvestigations.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConn
cyberinvestigations.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
Bilinmiyor→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/ef7e3b78-31a7-4054-bbdb-63f3c98e2edb
Page captured
View sourceNo threat flag
View source1 community references
View source3/95 engine detections
View sourcecyberinvestigations.online
View source1 topluluk üyesi tarafından bildirildi; ilk görülme 19.10.2025
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
cyberinvestigations.online)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.