VirusTotal
10 / 89 engine detections
Raporu açOltalama: crypto-75w.netlify.app — İçerik kullanılamıyor (HTTP 404). Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 10/89 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, ESET, Forcepoint…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
10 / 89 engine detections
Raporu açno community references
Raporu açprovider verdict: clean
Raporu aç80/100
Raporu açNo threat flag
Raporu açNo malicious flag
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
crypto-75w.netlify.app is an impersonation phishing page built on a free Netlify subdomain and dressed up as a legitimate crypto service to win the trust of wallet users. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-08. The site went offline on 2026-09-16, and as of 2026-10-19 the address serves no content at its root.
Impersonation pages copy the branding, layout and wording of a real crypto project so visitors believe they are on the official site. From there the victim is typically asked to connect a wallet, sign a transaction or type in a recovery phrase to verify, claim or restore something. A recovery phrase gives the attacker full control of the wallet, and a malicious signature or token approval lets them move assets out without further consent. Either way, the losses are usually immediate and irreversible.
Ten of 89 VirusTotal engines classified the address as malicious on 2026-09-16, including BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, alphaMountain.ai, LevelBlue and Lionic. That is a modest share, but it comes from several unrelated vendors. Crypto-specific defenses also listed it: the site appears on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists alongside PhishDestroy, so wallet users with those protections would have seen a warning.
The page sat on a randomly named Netlify subdomain, a pattern scammers favor because it costs nothing, needs no domain registration and can be discarded within days. That fits the timeline here, where the page stayed live for only about eight days after PhishDestroy first flagged it. Traffic was served from Amazon infrastructure in Germany, which hosts Netlify's platform. The DigiCert certificate is Netlify's shared one, so the padlock in the browser said nothing about who ran the page.
If you connected a wallet to this page, review and revoke any token approvals or permissions you granted, then move remaining funds to a fresh wallet. If you typed a seed phrase or private key, treat that wallet as fully compromised and transfer everything you can to a new wallet created on a clean device. Always reach crypto services through their official, bookmarked address rather than links on hosting subdomains. Defenders should block the hostname, watch for similar crypto-themed Netlify subdomains, and report new ones to Netlify's abuse team for quick removal.
Last checked
Edge-IP itibarı bu etki alanıyla ilişkilendirilmez.
Location describes the IP network.
bc3a8134c21a842e64ea34d488826dd2ba50f59a3bcbaed1e6b71a4242de1478netlify.appSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of crypto-75w.netlify.app · checked Sep 8, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
crypto-75w.netlify.app
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Bilinmiyor→inactive
http_no_content
Erişilebilir→Mevcut değil
9→10
3→9
0→3
Erişilebilir
No threat flag
View source10/89 engine detections
View sourcecrypto-75w.netlify.app
View sourcePage captured
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
crypto-75w.netlify.app)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.