VirusTotal
9 / 91 engine detections
Raporu aç“Acrodrome Protocol”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@name.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 5 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Oltalama: aerodromev2.finance — Bilinen son aktif (HTTP 308). Kanıt özeti: VirusTotal 9/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet…
Özgün adli kaydı korumak için aşağıdaki ayrıntılı PhishDestroy AI analizi İngilizce bırakılmıştır.
9 / 91 engine detections
Raporu açSuspicious
Raporu açchecked — no detections recorded
Raporu açchecked — no match recorded
23 community references
Raporu açNo threat flag
Raporu açNo malicious flag
Raporu açResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
The domain aerodromev2.finance has been identified as a phishing infrastructure specifically designed to impersonate Aerodrome Protocol, a decentralized finance platform. This domain is classified as a generic phishing threat targeting users through fraudulent interfaces mimicking legitimate crypto services. As of the latest assessment, the domain has been taken offline, but prior activity indicates active credential harvesting and asset diversion attempts. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered through Name.com, Inc. on April 26, 2026, and resolves to the IP address 104.21.9.3, which is associated with Cloudflare’s content delivery network. Despite its malicious intent, the domain was not flagged by any of the 95 vendors on VirusTotal at the time of analysis. However, it appears on three security blocklists, including MetaMask and PhishDestroy, and holds a Gridinsoft trust score of 0/100. The site employed technologies such as Bootstrap, Unpkg, jsDelivr, AOS, and HTTP/3, alongside a Let’s Encrypt SSL certificate, to create a deceptive appearance of legitimacy. Current status confirms the domain is offline, but the infrastructure remains a potential risk for re-emergence or reuse. Organizations and individuals are advised to block the domain and its associated IP at the network level. Users should verify all crypto-related interactions through official channels and enable multi-factor authentication where possible. Security teams are recommended to monitor for similar domains leveraging Cloudflare IPs or Let’s Encrypt certificates in phishing campaigns, particularly those impersonating decentralized finance protocols.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP itibarı bu etki alanıyla ilişkilendirilmez.
ryan.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
58aecc582d524ec5008d9ed04a34577aa397b6686594e22b063d078b68d006d5Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of aerodromev2.finance · checked Jun 26, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
redirect: raw=redirect_308; http=308; via=https_proxy; location=https://aerodromev2.finance/; server=cloudflare
aerodromev2.finance
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
Bilinmiyor→redirected
http_redirect
1→Observation retained
23 community references
View source9/91 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceaerodromev2.finance
View sourcePD-20260426-6293B4
1 topluluk üyesi tarafından bildirildi; ilk görülme 26.04.2026
PD-20260426-6293B4 Recipient: abuse@name.com Hesap kimlik bilgilerini, kişisel bilgileri veya ödeme bilgilerini girdiyseniz ya da bu alan adından bir dosya indirdiyseniz hemen harekete geçin. Aşağıda olayı bildirmenize ve kendinizi korumanıza yardımcı olacak kaynaklar bulunmaktadır.
resmi siber suç iletişim bilgileri veya şikayet taslağı oluştur → almak için ülkenizi seçin.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
aerodromev2.finance)Tüm ayrıntıları bilmeseniz bile — yine de şikayette bulun. Kısmi bilgiler de soruşturmalara yardımcı olmaktadır.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Saklanan engelleme listesi, WHOIS, DNS ve genel tarama kanıtlarını kullanarak tehdit analizi
Şimdi TaraŞüpheli alan adlarını tehdit veritabanımıza bildirin — topluluğu koruyun
BildirSon kimlik avı raporları ve gözlemlenen kullanılabilirlik değişiklikleri
İzleCanlı tehditleri izleyin veya bunun yanlış bir uyarı olduğunu düşünüyorsanız bu kayda itiraz edin
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.