VirusTotal
9 / 89
“Vote”
votelisting.digital — Conteúdo indisponível. Representação da marca: ["coinmarketcap"]; Tipo de golpe: Impersonation. Resumo das evidências: VirusTotal 9/89 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data); 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. Registrador: PDR.
A análise detalhada do PhishDestroy AI permanece em inglês para preservar o registro forense original.
9 / 89
checked — no detections recorded
Denunciar4 community references
Denunciarprovider verdict: clean
Denunciarrelatório armazenado
Denunciar Análise concluída
DenunciarChecked; no threat flag recorded
DenunciarStored evidence for votelisting.digital: VirusTotal recorded 9 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-16. That ratio reproduces the stored check in its original units and is not converted into another measure. MetaMask and SEAL appear as named external blocklist observations for votelisting.digital. Each item in this report remains at the scope supplied by its dated source record.
VirusTotal records 9 detections among 89 scanners in the stored snapshot dated 2026-09-16. The numerator describes scanners that produced detections, while the denominator describes scanners included in that check. The reverse order would materially alter the stored result. The VirusTotal snapshot dated 2026-09-16 supplies no common rationale covering the included scanners, and this report adds none. A later VirusTotal snapshot may contain different values, so any comparison should preserve the exact ratio and date of each snapshot.
MetaMask and SEAL are recorded as named external blocklist observations for votelisting.digital in the snapshot dated 2026-09-16. The stored MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records supply names and entries, but they supply no shared method or common rationale. PhishDestroy’s catalogue also contains votelisting.digital as a publisher record. That PhishDestroy record is counted separately from the MetaMask and SEAL external blocklist observations. This separation keeps the origin of every entry visible and prevents a single stored item from being counted again under another source label.
The record first observed votelisting.digital on 2026-09-15. The MetaMask and SEAL blocklist snapshot is dated 2026-09-16 and remains a separate event in the stored timeline. The registration date is separately recorded as 2026-09-14. A URLScan reference was stored on 2026-09-16 as a dated artifact for review. Each timestamp qualifies only the adjacent observation in this timeline. Later collection results should be compared with these dated values without replacing the earlier snapshot.
The source stores 185.166.154.206 as the observed address in this record. The registration date for votelisting.digital is recorded as 2026-09-14. The SSL issuer is recorded as YR1 in the snapshot dated 2026-09-16. The observed server header is recorded as SimpleHTTP/0.6 Python/3.10.12 in this record. These fields preserve registration, network, and certificate context stored in this record. The report preserves each label and number as a separate source value instead of combining them into an invented aggregate. Keeping the fields separate leaves every infrastructure value traceable to the record that supplied it.
The votelisting.digital record states that VirusTotal recorded 9 detections among 89 scanners on 2026-09-16. MetaMask and SEAL remain named blocklist observations from the snapshot dated 2026-09-16. PhishDestroy remains a separate publisher catalogue entry in the stored record. The observed address field in this record contains 185.166.154.206. The supported conclusion is bounded to the exact stored observations for votelisting.digital. Any statement beyond those source values would require additional dated material.
Avoid submitting sensitive information to votelisting.digital during review. Use a known service address obtained separately from this report for any necessary access. Defenders can retain votelisting.digital as an exact indicator and preserve relevant DNS, proxy, and endpoint records. Compare later VirusTotal snapshots and MetaMask and SEAL blocklist records with the dated values above instead of replacing them. Keep each later observation with its source date so changes remain visible during follow-up review. If a defensive rule is needed, keep its scope to votelisting.digital. The stored record does not justify extending that rule to 185.166.154.206 or to other infrastructure records.
Observações armazenadas comparando o rastreador com o navegador para este host, além de uma verificação em tempo real da assinatura digital para sistemas de distribuição de tráfego do tipo Keitaro.
Nota do digitalizador: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='votelisting.digital', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionE
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
glen.ns.cloudflare.comnorah.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
185.166.154.206. 15 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
PD-20260915-AC31C6 Recipient: abuse@publicdomainregistry.com Registrar: PublicDomainRegistry (PDR Ltd.) (India) Policy Violations: Explicit policy to immediately suspend domains used for phishing, 419 scams, identity fraud, malware distribution without prior notice Applicable Laws: IT Act 2000 §§66C–66D (identity theft, cheating by personation), Indian Penal Code §420 / Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita §318 (fraud)
Se você inseriu credenciais de conta, informações pessoais ou de pagamento, ou baixou um arquivo deste domínio, tome medidas imediatas. Abaixo estão os recursos para ajudá-lo a relatar o incidente e se proteger.
Selecione seu país para obter contactos oficiais do cibercrime ou crie um rascunho de reclamação →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Análise de ameaças usando lista de bloqueio armazenada, WHOIS, DNS e evidências de verificação pública
Digitalize agoraEnvie domínios suspeitos para nosso banco de dados de ameaças — proteja a comunidade
DenunciarRelatórios recentes de phishing e alterações de disponibilidade observadas
MonitorarMonitore ameaças em tempo real ou conteste esta listagem caso acredite que se trate de um falso positivo