VirusTotal
2 / 91
engines flag the domain
“Komainu Client Custody”
2 / 91
engines flag the domain
No threat flag
Not on Google threat lists at check time
No malicious flag
Browser scan with screenshot
0
threat pulses mention the domain
Online · HTTP 409
Cloudflare · 162.159.142.117
malicious
Each check shows its own collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety.
Imitação de MetaMask: komainuclientcustody.com — Não verificado (HTTP 409). Resumo das evidências: VirusTotal 2/91 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF); 2 external…
A análise detalhada do PhishDestroy AI permanece em inglês para preservar o registro forense original.
2 / 91 engine detections
Abrir relatórioSuspicious
Abrir relatório1 community reference
Abrir relatórioNo threat flag
Abrir relatórioNo malicious flag
Abrir relatórioResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
komainuclientcustody.com presents itself as "Komainu Client Custody" and borrows the name of Komainu, a digital-asset custodian that serves institutional clients. The domain does not belong to the real company. It is built to look like a client-facing custody portal and aims at funds, family offices and other holders who would expect to log in to such a service. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-30. Its live status could not be confirmed as of 2026-10-19.
Fake custody portals copy the look of a trusted custodian so that a client lands on a convincing "client custody" sign-in or onboarding screen. Victims are pushed to enter account credentials, two-factor codes or identity documents. In some versions they are also told to move assets to deposit addresses that supposedly belong to the custodian. Whatever is typed or sent goes to the operators. Losses can include custody account access, sensitive corporate KYC material and any crypto transferred under the pretext of safekeeping.
Detection is still thin. On 2026-09-30, 2 of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain, alphaMountain.ai and CRDF, so most scanners will not warn a visitor yet. The stronger signal comes from crypto-specific defenses. Besides PhishDestroy, MetaMask's phishing list and the SEAL blocklist both carry the domain. One AlienVault OTX threat pulse also references it.
The domain was registered through NameCheap, Inc. on 2026-09-21 and was flagged nine days later. That short gap is typical of a lookalike name set up for a specific campaign. The site sits behind Cloudflare, Inc., with the address geolocating to Canada. This reflects the proxy network and says nothing about where the operators or the origin server are located.
If you entered a username, password or 2FA code here, change the password on the genuine Komainu account at once. Reset two-factor authentication, end active sessions, and alert your Komainu relationship contact so they can watch for unauthorized activity. If you uploaded identity or company documents, treat them as exposed and warn your compliance team. If you sent assets to an address shown on this site, record the transaction hashes and report them to the custodian and law enforcement. Do not pay any "release" or "verification" fee that follows. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and the mail gateway. They should also hunt in mail and proxy logs for clicks since 2026-09-21 and warn staff who handle custody operations about lookalike Komainu domains.
Last checked
A reputação do Edge-IP não é atribuída a este domínio.
eforward2.registrar-servers.compriority 10eforward1.registrar-servers.compriority 10eforward3.registrar-servers.compriority 10eforward4.registrar-servers.compriority 15eforward5.registrar-servers.compriority 20Location describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
http_other: raw=http_409; http=409; via=http_proxy; server=cloudflare
komainuclientcustody.com
1 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source2/91 engine detections
View sourcekomainuclientcustody.com
View source79 domínios semelhantes armazenados
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Se você inseriu credenciais de conta, informações pessoais ou de pagamento, ou baixou um arquivo deste domínio, tome medidas imediatas. Abaixo estão os recursos para ajudá-lo a relatar o incidente e se proteger.
Selecione seu país para obter contactos oficiais do cibercrime ou crie um rascunho de reclamação →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
komainuclientcustody.com)Mesmo que você não tenha todos os detalhes — registre uma ocorrência mesmo assim. Mesmo informações parciais ainda ajudam nas investigações.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Análise de ameaças usando lista de bloqueio armazenada, WHOIS, DNS e evidências de verificação pública
Digitalize agoraEnvie domínios suspeitos para nosso banco de dados de ameaças — proteja a comunidade
DenunciarRelatórios recentes de phishing e alterações de disponibilidade observadas
MonitorarMonitore ameaças em tempo real ou conteste esta listagem caso acredite que se trate de um falso positivo
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.