VirusTotal
1 / 89 engine detections
Abrir relatórioDomínio em listas de bloqueio: gain-hook.com — Conteúdo indisponível. Resumo das evidências: VirusTotal 1/89 (CRDF); URLScan malicious verdict; 2 external…
A análise detalhada do PhishDestroy AI permanece em inglês para preservar o registro forense original.
1 / 89 engine detections
Abrir relatórioMalicioso
Abrir relatório4 community references
Abrir relatórioprovider verdict: clean
Abrir relatório80/100
Abrir relatórioNo threat flag
Abrir relatórioResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
gain-hook.com is an impersonation phishing page that urlscan.io matched to the Cloudflare brand. It sits on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists, so it was aimed at people using crypto wallets. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-17. It went offline the next day, 2026-09-18, and was still dead when last checked on 2026-10-19.
The page showed only the title "Loading…", a generic placeholder rather than a brand name, while we classify the site as impersonation. Fake Cloudflare-style screens like this pose as a routine browser or security check, the kind of interstitial most people click through without thinking. Once the visitor trusts the page, these schemes typically push a wallet connection, a signature request or another action. That step hands control of funds or credentials to the operator. Because the page borrows the look of infrastructure people see every day, nothing about it feels like a crypto offer, and that is the point.
Wallet-focused defenders acted first. MetaMask and SEAL both blocklist the domain, alongside PhishDestroy. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and identified Cloudflare as the imitated brand. On VirusTotal, only CRDF flagged it, 1 of 89 engines on 2026-09-17. Coverage among general antivirus vendors was thin at that point. Four AlienVault OTX threat pulses also reference the domain, which shows other researchers tracked it independently.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-09 through Fewmoretaps OU, which trades as Trustname.com. That was eight days before PhishDestroy detected it. The short gap and the one-day lifespan after detection fit a throwaway domain built for a brief campaign. The site sat behind Cloudflare's network, with the address placed in Canada, so the real origin server is hidden. That also means the brand it imitated and the service fronting it were the same name. Its free Let's Encrypt certificate gave visitors a padlock, which says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you connected a wallet or signed anything on this page, move funds you can still reach to a fresh wallet. Then revoke token approvals granted to unfamiliar addresses using a reputable approval checker. If you typed a seed phrase, treat that wallet as fully compromised and stop using it. If you entered a password, change it and turn on two-factor authentication. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level and search logs for visits between 2026-09-09 and 2026-09-18. Users should learn that a real Cloudflare check never asks for a wallet connection or a recovery phrase.
Last checked
A reputação do Edge-IP não é atribuída a este domínio.
eoin.ns.cloudflare.comfrida.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
98cfb1d5db69b9c020bb4a343153788689ea9f3c10bc968ee41a2847ffabb90fSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of gain-hook.com · checked Sep 17, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
gain-hook.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Acessível→Indisponível
Acessível
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source1/89 engine detections
View sourcegain-hook.com
View sourcePage captured
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
Se você inseriu credenciais de conta, informações pessoais ou de pagamento, ou baixou um arquivo deste domínio, tome medidas imediatas. Abaixo estão os recursos para ajudá-lo a relatar o incidente e se proteger.
Selecione seu país para obter contactos oficiais do cibercrime ou crie um rascunho de reclamação →.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
gain-hook.com)Mesmo que você não tenha todos os detalhes — registre uma ocorrência mesmo assim. Mesmo informações parciais ainda ajudam nas investigações.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
Análise de ameaças usando lista de bloqueio armazenada, WHOIS, DNS e evidências de verificação pública
Digitalize agoraEnvie domínios suspeitos para nosso banco de dados de ameaças — proteja a comunidade
DenunciarRelatórios recentes de phishing e alterações de disponibilidade observadas
MonitorarMonitore ameaças em tempo real ou conteste esta listagem caso acredite que se trate de um falso positivo
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.