VirusTotal
14 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기vip.foapux.com — 확인되지 않음. 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 14/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar, ESET); URLScan malicious verdict; Spamhaus DBL_PHISH; PhishDestroy score 95/100. 등록기관: Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a T….
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
14 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기DBL_PHISH
악성
보고서 열기no community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
vip.foapux.com is a phishing page that poses as a legitimate crypto service to win the trust of cryptocurrency users. The "vip" subdomain fits a common lure that promises exclusive access or premium returns. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-29. On the latest check, 2026-10-19, the hostname had stopped resolving in DNS, so the page was unreachable, but the domain is still registered and could be pointed at a server again.
Impersonation pages copy the look of a trusted exchange, wallet or investment platform. They then ask the visitor to sign in, enter a recovery phrase, connect a wallet or send a deposit to unlock "VIP" features. Anything typed into the page goes straight to the operators. A deposit sent to an address shown on the page cannot be recovered, and a leaked seed phrase or signed wallet request gives them control of the victim's assets.
Several independent sources flag this site. On 2026-10-01, 14 of 91 VirusTotal engines marked it as malicious, including BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF and CyRadar. That spread across unrelated vendors makes a false positive unlikely. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and tagged the page as a crypto scam. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL under the phishing category, which lets mail filters and DNS resolvers block it.
foapux.com was registered on 2026-06-26 through Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a Trustname.com, about three months before it was detected. That gap suggests the domain was registered early and held until it was needed. The site was hosted in Germany on the network of FEMO IT SOLUTIONS LIMITED. Its TLS certificate came from Let's Encrypt, so the browser padlock says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you entered a password on this site, change it on the real service right away and turn on app-based 2FA. If you typed in a seed phrase, treat that wallet as compromised and move any remaining funds to a new wallet created on a clean device. If you connected a wallet, check and revoke any token approvals you granted. Do not send further "fees" to recover a deposit, because these requests are part of the same scam. Defenders should block foapux.com and its subdomains at DNS and mail gateways and add the Spamhaus DBL listing to their filtering.
urlscan.io scan and screenshot: https://urlscan.io/result/01a0ec84-2e56-71a9-981b-70c10a35c1e2/
VirusTotal report: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/vip.foapux.com
Google Safe Browsing status: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=vip.foapux.com
Report phishing to Google: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Site owner? Request a review: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
katja.ns.cloudflare.comyisroel.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
f1aaef18be1aa16702028717678eea56ae80aef84d62cc97f0e347da996c5a8bSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→live_content
content_served
live_content→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
13→14
0→13
No threat flag
View source14/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourcevip.foapux.com
View source커뮤니티 신고 1건
범주OTHER
Suspected abuse at foapux.com
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
vip.foapux.com
“Suspected abuse at foapux.com”
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
vip.foapux.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.