VirusTotal
11 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기testminesgamb23234.com — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 301). 브랜드 사칭: MetaMask; 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 11/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, CyRadar); Spamhaus DBL_PHISH; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a T….
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
11 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기DBL_PHISH
2 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
testminesgamb23234.com is an impersonation phishing page. Its name points to a crypto "mines" gambling game, and it targets players and wallet users who expect a legitimate betting site. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-06. When last checked on 2026-10-19, the domain was still online and redirecting visitors elsewhere, so it remains a live risk.
Impersonation pages copy the look and feel of a trusted service so visitors relax and do what they would do on the real site. On a gambling lure, that usually means logging in, depositing crypto, or connecting a wallet to "play." Whatever goes in is lost: account credentials end up with the operators, deposits go to their addresses, and a wallet connection can be abused to request signatures or token approvals that move funds out. The redirect means the domain may act as an entry point that passes victims on to wherever the scam is currently hosted.
Eleven of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain when PhishDestroy checked it on 2026-10-06. The vendors include BitDefender, Kaspersky, G-Data, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, CyRadar and the Vietnamese anti-scam group Chong Lua Dao. Spamhaus lists it in its DBL under the phishing category. MetaMask and SEAL both block it, which matters most to crypto users because those warnings appear directly in wallets and security tooling. It also appears in two AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
The domain was registered on 2026-07-13 through Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a Trustname.com. It was in use for roughly 85 days before PhishDestroy flagged it. That throwaway, numbered name suggests a disposable domain from a batch rather than a brand-building site. It sits behind Cloudflare (AS13335) in the US, which hides the real origin server.
If you entered a password on this site, change it wherever you reused it and turn on app-based 2FA. If you sent a deposit, treat it as lost and ignore any follow-up demands for "verification" or "withdrawal fees" to release winnings. If you connected a wallet or signed anything, review and revoke token approvals with a trusted revoke tool, and move remaining assets to a fresh wallet if you approved unknown transactions. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, follow its redirect target, and report it to Cloudflare and the registrar.
urlscan.io scan and screenshot: https://urlscan.io/result/01a0dfe2-daf9-72c1-8270-bfe8e95b3aec/
VirusTotal report: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/testminesgamb23234.com
Google Safe Browsing status: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=testminesgamb23234.com
Report phishing to Google: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Site owner? Request a review: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/
Last checked
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
igor.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
c62a2c50181b017bfab01bd7f576ded64f60fe5392df442bb2d7936de3d4b690Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
No threat flag
View source2 community references
View source11/91 engine detections
View sourcetestminesgamb23234.com
View source저장된 유사 도메인 79개
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
testminesgamb23234.com
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
testminesgamb23234.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.