VirusTotal
14 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기“LOCALIQ”
techlocaliq.com — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 200). 브랜드 사칭: MetaMask; 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 14/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); URLScan malicious verdict; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: Gname.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
14 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기악성
보고서 열기2 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
techlocaliq.com is an impersonation phishing page that presents itself under the LOCALIQ name. The domain folds that brand into a "tech" prefix to look like an official service address. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-09-29. It was still online with live content when last checked on 2026-10-19. MetaMask and SEAL both list it, which places crypto users squarely among its intended victims.
The page, titled "LOCALIQ", borrows a recognizable business name so visitors trust what they see before they question the address. Impersonation sites like this typically ask for a login, a support verification or a wallet connection. Whatever is typed or approved goes straight to the operators. Depending on what the victim submits, the loss can be account credentials, personal details or, if a recovery phrase is entered or a wallet is connected, the funds that wallet controls.
On 2026-10-07, 14 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain, including BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft, alphaMountain.ai and CyRadar. That is a solid cross-vendor consensus rather than a single outlier. urlscan.io rated the page malicious, though its brand detection was only generic. Beyond our own blocklist, the domain appears on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists and is referenced in 2 AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
The domain was registered on 2025-10-21 through Gname.com Pte. Ltd., almost a year before PhishDestroy caught it. That long gap suggests it was either held in reserve or operated quietly before drawing attention. Traffic runs through Cloudflare, Inc. on an address geolocated to Canada. That puts a proxy in front of the real origin server, which therefore stays hidden from visitors.
If you entered a username or password on this page, change it immediately wherever it is reused and turn on app-based two-factor authentication. If you typed a seed phrase or private key, treat that wallet as compromised and move any remaining assets to a newly created wallet. Watch for follow-up emails or messages that reference LOCALIQ, since phishers often recontact their victims. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, search logs for any visits since 2026-09-29, and report the site to Cloudflare and Gname.com to speed up its takedown.
urlscan.io scan and screenshot: https://urlscan.io/result/01a0e58b-7833-74ed-b1eb-20db04578de5/
VirusTotal report: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/techlocaliq.com
Google Safe Browsing status: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=techlocaliq.com
Archived copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20260929044921/https://techlocaliq.com/
Report phishing to Google: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Site owner? Request a review: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/
Last checked
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
rommy.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
d8577429999b81feac1c18c305c6b15ea1b9ec9ccbf69e4d6f0e131609d03967Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of techlocaliq.com · checked Sep 29, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source14/92 engine detections
View source2 community references
View sourcetechlocaliq.com
View source저장된 유사 도메인 79개
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
techlocaliq.com
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
techlocaliq.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.