VirusTotal
15 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기sparkle-flicker.com — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 200). 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 15/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar, ESET); CF Radar malicious; PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: Dynadot.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
15 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기악성
보고서 열기4 community references
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
sparkle-flicker.com is an impersonation phishing page. It copies the look of a legitimate service so visitors trust it with sensitive information. The playful, generic name gives no hint of the brand it imitates, which helps it pass unnoticed in links and ads. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-16, and as of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its phishing content.
Impersonation pages work by borrowing trust. The victim lands on what looks like a familiar login screen, support portal or wallet page, usually through a link in a message, a search ad or a social media post. They are then asked to sign in, verify an account or confirm a wallet. Whatever they type goes straight to the operators. Depending on the target, that can mean stolen account passwords and 2FA codes, or a seed phrase that hands over full control of a crypto wallet.
On 2026-09-29, 15 of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as malicious. Among them were BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, alphaMountain.ai, Gridinsoft, CyRadar and the Vietnamese anti-scam group Chong Lua Dao. The domain also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers have independently tied it to malicious activity. That is moderate coverage. Many security products will still let the page load without a warning, so a browser that stays silent is not a sign that the site is safe.
The domain was registered through Dynadot Inc on 2025-11-11, roughly ten months before PhishDestroy detected it. That long gap suggests it was registered ahead of time and kept idle, or used quietly, before being turned against victims. Traffic passes through Cloudflare's network, which hides the actual origin server and places the visible endpoint in Canada. The site uses a standard Google Trust Services certificate, so the padlock in the address bar only means the connection is encrypted. It says nothing about who runs the site.
If you entered a password on this site, change it right away on the real service and anywhere else you reuse it. Then reset your two-factor authentication and review recent logins for unfamiliar activity. If you typed in a seed phrase or private key, treat that wallet as compromised and move your funds to a newly created wallet as soon as possible. Report the incident to the genuine service so it can watch your account. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, search mail and chat logs for links to it, and report it to Cloudflare and Dynadot to help get it taken down.
urlscan.io scan and screenshot: https://urlscan.io/result/019dc371-b195-729e-af81-eaba4f38ce00/
VirusTotal report: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/sparkle-flicker.com
Google Safe Browsing status: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=sparkle-flicker.com
Archived copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20260916190346/https://sparkle-flicker.com/
Report phishing to Google: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Site owner? Request a review: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
paloma.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
deb1a2842190a4e8da5078b2a765e1ecdc5d306f3e6593b85f37c7983e3dee5fSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of sparkle-flicker.com · checked Sep 16, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
이용 불가→접속 가능
접속 가능→이용 불가
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source15/91 engine detections
View sourcesparkle-flicker.com
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
sparkle-flicker.com
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
sparkle-flicker.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.