VirusTotal
14 / 89
보고서Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
Assessment based on the stored source evidence below. Review sources →
ripple.giving — 콘텐츠를 사용할 수 없음. 브랜드 사칭: XRP; 사기 유형: Brand Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 14/89 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF); URLQuery 1 alert; 4 external blocklist matches; PhishDestroy score 100/100.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
These are dated observations, not a live safety check. No flag, a stored capture, or a completed analysis does not establish that a site is safe.
14 / 89
보고서Engine detections from this stored analysis. Vendors and collection times may differ from other sources.
1 threat-system alert
보고서Alerts refer to the preserved scan. They do not describe the current state of the site.
4 external matches
세부 정보A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
1 community reference
보고서Community publication references, not a vendor verdict or evidence of a common operator.
저장된 보고서
A preserved page image documents what the collector received; a capture is not a safety verdict.
분석 완료
보고서This is the recorded automated analysis. Completion alone is not a safety verdict.
Checked; no threat flag recorded
보고서A result applies to the recorded source and observation time. Absence of a flag is not proof of safety.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quad9 DNS | ripple.giving |
malicious | Sinkholed |
AI-assisted analysis Stored narrative · generated . Provider checks below retain their own observation dates. This narrative is an interpretation of collected evidence, not an independent source verdict.
This domain, ripple.giving, poses a high-risk threat as a crypto wallet drainer targeting users of the XRP cryptocurrency. Analysis indicates the domain is designed to mimic legitimate XRP-related services, tricking victims into connecting their wallets to malicious smart contracts. Once connected, the drainer siphons funds by executing unauthorized transactions, often leaving victims with empty wallets and no recourse for recovery. The threat is particularly insidious due to its use of brand impersonation, leveraging the trust associated with the XRP name to deceive users into compromising their assets. Infrastructure analysis reveals the domain was registered on February 21, 2026, and has since been flagged by 12 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal. Additionally, the domain appears on five independent security blocklists, further confirming its malicious intent. The registrar details, while not publicly disclosed in this report, align with patterns observed in other high-risk crypto drainer campaigns. The domain's current offline status suggests takedown efforts, but similar domains often re-emerge under different names or TLDs, maintaining the threat landscape. Users who visited ripple.giving or interacted with any associated links should immediately revoke all wallet permissions granted to unknown or suspicious contracts. It is critical to audit wallet activity for unauthorized transactions and transfer remaining funds to a new, secure wallet. Additionally, users should monitor their devices for malware, as crypto drainers often deploy secondary payloads to maintain persistence. If financial loss occurred, report the incident to relevant authorities and provide all transaction hashes, timestamps, and domain interaction details for further investigation. Proactive measures, such as verifying domain legitimacy and avoiding unsolicited wallet connection requests, are essential to mitigate future risks.
17 · datasets with records / 14 · not recorded
What this report contains, where it came from, and when it was collected. A retained record can be incomplete; collection status is separate from the threat assessment.
These checks have no retained result. This does not mean they passed or that a scan is running.
4 · external source matches
104.21.64.1 · DNS, TLS and retained responses
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
Location describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Stored browser and crawler observations
이 호스트에 대해 저장된 크롤러 대 브라우저 관측 데이터와, 케이타로 스타일의 트래픽 분배 시스템을 위한 실시간 지문 확인 정보.
스캐너 메모: unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='ripple.giving', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("
Collection history, report status and investigation channels
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→알 수 없음
probe_inconclusive
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→알 수 없음
probe_inconclusive
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→알 수 없음
probe_inconclusive
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→알 수 없음
probe_inconclusive
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→알 수 없음
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→알 수 없음
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive→알 수 없음
origin_unreachable · http_5xx
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
11 recorded events. These records describe collected evidence, outgoing notifications and publication; they do not confirm a complete investigation or a takedown.
We scan suspicious URLs, inspect public results and send evidence through the appropriate abuse-reporting channels. The dated events above show what is recorded for this domain. The directory below explains the wider workflow.
Capture the rendered page, requests and visible infrastructure.
Compare the available engine results and retain the analysis timestamp.
Check whether Google currently lists the URL as unsafe.
Inspect a public scan and its recorded network and classification data.
Look for indicator references and related community intelligence.
Compare archived captures and preserve historical context.
Look for matching indicators and associated threat records.
Inspect certificate records and related hostnames.
Compare security resolver responses and record observed blocking.
Inspect the public DNS, TLS, HTTP and technology surface.
Security services used for scanning, reputation checks and reporting are listed below. A service being listed is not evidence that it received, accepted or acted on this particular domain. Recorded submissions appear in the notification history above.
Shared hosting, registrar records and related domains
Retained community reports and observations
커뮤니티 신고 1건
범주PHISHING
Malicious Website
커뮤니티 구성원 1명이 신고 · 최초 확인 2025년 8월 9일
Original reports, independent checks and evidence links
“Malicious Website”
Recovery steps, reporting contacts and complaint drafts
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
ripple.giving)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
이 보고서는 PhishDestroy에서 사용할 수 있는 최신 저장된 증거를 제공합니다. 가능한 경우 소스 타임스탬프가 표시됩니다. 가용성 및 공급업체 평가는 수집 후 변경될 수 있습니다.
2026-09-11 02:32:47 UTC부터 ripple.giving는 14 보안 엔진에서 탐지되었습니다.
Each source records a particular observation. A screenshot, an available website, or a result with no detections does not establish that a site is safe. Source results can change after they are collected.
이 목록이 정확하지 않다고 생각되면 항소를 제출하다. 당사의 방법론에 대해 알아보려면 FAQ 페이지를 방문하세요.