VirusTotal
6 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기“Polycolo”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@ufocorp.net.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 12 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
polycolo.com — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 200). 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 6/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft); Spamhaus DBL_SPAM; PhishDestroy score 93/100. 등록기관: TuringSign.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
6 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기Suspicious
보고서 열기DBL_SPAM
Scan report
보고서 열기3 community references
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
polycolo.com is an impersonation phishing site that presents itself under the name Polycolo, borrowing a trusted identity so visitors lower their guard. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-06, less than two weeks after the domain was registered. As of 2026-10-19 the site is still online and serving its content, so anyone sent to it today can still reach the live page.
Impersonation pages copy the look, wording and branding of a service people already trust. The page title, Polycolo, is the only brand signal the site shows. Victims usually arrive through ads, social posts or direct messages, then are asked to sign in, verify an account or enter sensitive details. Whatever they type, such as passwords, one-time codes, personal data or wallet secrets, goes straight to the operators. They can then take over the account or empty it.
VirusTotal shows 6 of 92 engines flagging the domain as of 2026-10-11: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That count is modest, so most security tools will not warn a visitor yet. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as spam, which suggests it is being pushed through unsolicited messaging. Three AlienVault OTX pulses reference it, so other researchers have tracked it independently alongside PhishDestroy's own blocklist entry.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-23 through TuringSign Inc. d/b/a Cosmotown and was caught on 2026-10-06, a 13-day gap that fits a freshly built phishing domain launched quickly. It resolves to 109.238.87.170 on the SERVER-MANIA (B2 Net Solutions Inc.) network, hosted in the US. The site uses a free, automatically issued Let's Encrypt certificate. The padlock in the browser only means the connection is encrypted and says nothing about whether the site is genuine.
If you entered a password on polycolo.com, change it right away on the real service and on any other account that uses the same password. Turn on two-factor authentication and sign out of all active sessions. If you entered a recovery phrase or private key, treat that wallet as compromised and move your funds to a new wallet created on a clean device. Watch your accounts for logins, changes or transfers you did not make, and report them to the genuine provider. Defenders should block the domain and its IP at DNS, proxy and mail gateways, and search logs for users who visited the site.
a.dnspod.comb.dnspod.comc.dnspod.comLocation describes the IP network.
49dac7e5283fa28bee27163c7cd9d03c9038f439ec1e1b466df2b097eabe5a28Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of polycolo.com · checked Oct 6, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source6/92 engine detections
View sourcePD-20261007-5A1A51
3 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcepolycolo.com
View source저장된 유사 도메인 170개
전체 170개 중 100개 표시
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
polycolo.com
PD-20261007-5A1A51 Recipient: abuse@ufocorp.net 계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
polycolo.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.