VirusTotal
9 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기“Briefly unavailable for scheduled maintenance”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@ovh.net.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 20 days has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
old.cricketpavers.com — 확인되지 않음. 브랜드 사칭: Bancaintesasanpaolo; 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 9/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Certego, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet); URLQuery 2 det.; URLScan malicious verdict; PhishDestroy score 95/100. 등록기관: GoDaddy.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
9 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기2 det.
보고서 열기악성
보고서 열기no community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
old.cricketpavers.com is a phishing page that impersonates Banca Intesa Sanpaolo, the Italian bank, and targets its online banking customers. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-29. As of 2026-10-19 the host still responds, but the content no longer resolves through DNS, so the phishing page is effectively offline for now.
Bank impersonation pages copy the look of the real login portal and are usually reached through SMS or email lures that warn of a blocked account, a suspicious payment or a required security update. The victim enters a username, password and often a one-time code or card details, which go straight to the operators. They can then log in, approve transfers or enrol a new device before the customer notices. When last loaded, the page title read "Briefly unavailable for scheduled maintenance," a generic site-maintenance message, while urlscan.io matched the content to the Intesa Sanpaolo brand.
urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and specifically recognised Banca Intesa Sanpaolo branding. VirusTotal shows 9 of 91 engines flagging the address as of 2026-10-01, including alphaMountain.ai, Certego, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, MalwareURL and SOCRadar. That count is modest, so many browsers and filters may not have warned visitors. PhishDestroy lists the domain on its blocklist.
The parent domain cricketpavers.com was registered on 2015-03-05 through GoDaddy.com, LLC, more than a decade before the phishing page appeared. The page sat on the "old." subdomain of this established name rather than on a freshly registered domain. It was served from OVH SAS infrastructure in France at 151.80.77.246.
If you entered your Intesa Sanpaolo credentials on this page, call the bank through the number on your card or its official app, ask them to block online access, and change your password from a trusted device. Review recent transactions and registered devices, cancel any card whose details you typed, and treat any follow-up call or message claiming to be from the bank's security team as suspect. Never share one-time codes with anyone. Defenders should block the hostname and its IP, search mail and SMS gateway logs for links to it, and alert the owner of cricketpavers.com that their subdomain hosted phishing content.
ns19.domaincontrol.comns20.domaincontrol.comLocation describes the IP network.
720d10ddc304abb4a465aecea5e6c4a24e1e27ca3242b536b196b46c88d29854Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of old.cricketpavers.com · checked Sep 29, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
old.cricketpavers.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
8→9
No threat flag
View source9/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260929-17A386
Page captured
View sourceold.cricketpavers.com
View sourcePD-20260929-17A386 Recipient: abuse@ovh.net 계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
old.cricketpavers.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.