VirusTotal
5 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기nalewin.com — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 301). 브랜드 사칭: Google; 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 5/92 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, SOCRadar, VIPRE); PhishDestroy score 88/100. 등록기관: Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a T….
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
5 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기3 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
nalewin.com is an impersonation phishing site. It borrows the identity of a trusted service so visitors believe they are on the real thing and hand over what that service would normally ask for. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-07. As of 2026-10-19 the domain is still alive and redirects visitors onward rather than serving a page directly, which means the link remains dangerous to click.
Impersonation pages copy the look, wording and flow of a known brand closely enough that a hurried visitor does not question the address bar. The victim is steered toward a login form, a verification step or a payment prompt, and anything typed there goes straight to the operators. In crypto-focused campaigns that can include exchange credentials, one-time 2FA codes or a wallet recovery phrase, any of which lets the attacker empty accounts within minutes. The redirect means the domain can act as an entry link that forwards traffic to wherever the operators currently host their fake page.
Five of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-10-19: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That is a modest count, but it comes from five independent vendors, and it is typical for a domain that is only weeks old. The domain also appears in three AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers have tied it to malicious activity. Among blocklists, it is currently listed by PhishDestroy.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-15 through Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a Trustname.com and was caught 22 days later. That short gap between registration and active abuse is the usual pattern for disposable phishing domains. It sits behind Cloudflare (AS13335, US), which hides the real origin server from visitors. Its Google Trust Services certificate shows only that the connection is encrypted, so the padlock is no sign that the site is genuine.
If you entered a password on this site, change it immediately on the real service and on any account that reuses it. Then enable or reset 2FA and sign out all active sessions. If you typed a recovery phrase, treat that wallet as compromised and move any remaining funds to a newly created wallet. If you made a payment, contact your bank or exchange at once and report the transaction. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, search mail and web logs for clicks since 2026-10-07, and report it to Cloudflare and the registrar's abuse desk.
urlscan.io scan and screenshot: https://urlscan.io/result/01a0c96b-0807-774e-8a26-42d4b9eb0386/
VirusTotal report: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/nalewin.com
Google Safe Browsing status: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=nalewin.com
Report phishing to Google: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Site owner? Request a review: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
terry.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
dcad38b6dcd81390010d4858f27151e4f446f0f768c4530ed1a8f80d37c2e284Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
1→2
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
No threat flag
View source5/92 engine detections
View source3 community references
View sourcenalewin.com
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
nalewin.com
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
nalewin.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.