VirusTotal
11 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기“Not Acceptable!”
minishop.in — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 302). 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 11/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CyRadar, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data); PhishDestroy score 98/100. 등록기관: GoDaddy.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
11 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기30 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
minishop.in is an impersonation phishing site. It presents itself as a legitimate brand or service so visitors trust it with their credentials or payment information. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-12. On 2026-10-19 the domain was still online and was redirecting visitors elsewhere, so the threat remains active.
Impersonation pages copy the look, wording and flow of a service the victim already uses, then ask the victim to sign in, confirm an order or verify payment details. Anything typed into those forms goes to the operators, who can take over the account or reuse the card and identity details. The page title currently reads "Not Acceptable!", which looks like a server error rather than a branded page, but we classify the domain as impersonation. Because the domain now redirects, the destination can change at any time, and a link that once loaded an error can later lead to a convincing login form.
On 2026-10-12, 11 of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain. Detecting vendors include alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CyRadar, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Kaspersky, Lionic and Seclookup. These are independent vendors with no connection to us, so their verdicts reinforce our classification. The domain also appears in 30 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which means other researchers have tracked it as part of wider malicious activity. Among blocklists, it is currently listed by PhishDestroy.
The domain was registered through GoDaddy on 2014-09-20, about twelve years before we detected it. A domain that old carries more reputation than a freshly registered lookalike, which can help it slip past filters that score new domains as risky. It is hosted on the Unified Layer network, with the server located in India. The site serves a Sectigo domain-validated certificate, so the padlock in the browser proves only that the connection is encrypted, not that the site is genuine.
If you entered a password on minishop.in, change it right away on the real service, and on any other account that uses the same password, then turn on two-factor authentication. If you submitted card or bank details, contact your bank to block the card and dispute any charges you don't recognize. Be suspicious of follow-up emails or calls that mention an order or account check, because stolen details often feed a second round of phishing. Defenders should block the domain at DNS, proxy and mail gateways, add it to watchlists given its active redirect, and search their logs for users who visited it on or after 2026-10-12.
urlscan.io scan and screenshot: https://urlscan.io/result/01a0d710-aa76-7506-af72-d8229d7884a5/
VirusTotal report: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/minishop.in
Google Safe Browsing status: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=minishop.in
Archived copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20190821105421/http://minishop.in:80/
Report phishing to Google: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Site owner? Request a review: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/
ns2.sh003.webhostbox.netLocation describes the IP network.
9f536d377aa22a4ab21ed9caec2dcb15694c006cc722dc502e04c92a828b013fwebhostbox.netSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
No threat flag
View source30 community references
View source11/92 engine detections
View sourceminishop.in
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
minishop.in
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
minishop.in)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.