VirusTotal
8 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기microsoftonlimes.com — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 301). 브랜드 사칭: Microsoft; 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 8/89 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data); Google Safe Browsing flagged; Spamhaus DBL_PHISH; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL); PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: GoDaddy.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
8 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기Threat flag recorded
보고서 열기DBL_PHISH
3 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기80/100
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
microsoftonlimes.com is a phishing domain that impersonates Microsoft. The name swaps the "n" in "online" for an "m", a misspelling that is easy to miss in an email link or on a phone screen. It targets anyone with a Microsoft account. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-01, and on 2026-10-19 the site was still alive and redirecting visitors elsewhere.
Look-alike Microsoft domains are usually sent out as fake security alerts, shared-file notices or mailbox warnings that push the reader to sign in. The page copies Microsoft's sign-in screen, and any email address and password typed into it go straight to the operators. With those credentials an attacker can read mail, reset passwords on linked services, open stored files and use the hijacked mailbox to phish the victim's own contacts. The active redirect means the domain still works as an entry point that passes visitors on to wherever the operators currently host their page.
On 2026-09-13, 8 of 89 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, Google Safe Browsing, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar. That count is modest, but the vendors are independent of each other, and Google Safe Browsing labels the site as social engineering, which triggers browser warnings for many users. Spamhaus lists it in its DBL as phishing. The MetaMask and SEAL blocklists carry it alongside PhishDestroy, and it appears in 3 AlienVault OTX threat pulses.
The domain was registered through GoDaddy on 2026-08-31, one day before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap points to a domain bought for an immediate campaign rather than one that sat unused for months. It is hosted on IONOS SE in the United States. Its free Let's Encrypt certificate gives it a browser padlock, so the padlock alone says nothing about whether the site is genuine.
If you entered a Microsoft password on this site, change it at once from Microsoft's real sign-in page, then change it on every other service where you reused it. Turn on or reset two-step verification, sign out of all sessions and check your account's recent activity for unfamiliar logins. Also look for new mail-forwarding or inbox rules the attacker may have added. Security teams should block the domain at mail and web gateways, search their logs for clicks on it and reset the credentials of any user who reached it.
Last checked
ns50.domaincontrol.commicrosoftonlimes-com.mail.protection.outlook.compriority 0Location describes the IP network.
8d57f5330cdf3516df5972028bb32845d73225f4499f54ba245bc2de6e5aa770admin.microsoftonlimes.comlogin.microsoftonlimes.comwww.microsoftonlimes.comSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
admin.microsoftonlimes.comDomain recordlogin.microsoftonlimes.comDomain recordwww.microsoftonlimes.comDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→inactive
http_no_content
알 수 없음→inactive
http_no_content
알 수 없음→inactive
http_no_content
이용 불가→접속 가능
접속 가능→이용 불가
0→8
No flag recorded→Flag recorded
접속 가능
3 community references
View sourceThreat flag recorded
View source8/89 engine detections
View sourcemicrosoftonlimes.com
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
microsoftonlimes.com
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
microsoftonlimes.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.