VirusTotal
14 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기lilac-haven.com — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 200). 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 14/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); CF Radar malicious; PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: Dynadot.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
14 / 91 engine detections
보고서 열기악성
보고서 열기4 community references
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
lilac-haven.com is an impersonation phishing site. It dresses itself up as a service people already trust so that visitors lower their guard and act on what the page asks. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-18. As of 2026-10-19 the site is still online and serving its content, so it remains a live risk to anyone who lands on it.
Impersonation pages copy the look, wording and flow of a legitimate brand, then insert a step that benefits the operator. That step is usually a login form, a verification request, a payment or a request for identity details. Whatever the visitor types goes straight to the people running the site. The victim can lose account access, card or bank details, or personal information that is later reused for fraud and further targeted phishing. The name lilac-haven.com has no obvious tie to any real brand, which is common for throwaway domains that get their credibility from the page design rather than the address.
On 2026-09-29, 14 of 91 VirusTotal engines classed the domain as malicious. Those engines included BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, G-Data, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, alphaMountain.ai and the Vietnamese anti-scam group Chong Lua Dao. Detection by vendors who run independent feeds carries more weight than a single verdict. The domain also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers have tracked it as well. Most engines still show it as clean, which means many browsers and filters may not warn users yet.
The domain was registered through Dynadot Inc on 2025-11-10, roughly ten months before PhishDestroy detected it. That long gap suggests it was either held in reserve or reused for this campaign. Traffic runs through Cloudflare, with the edge address resolving to Canada, so the real origin server stays hidden behind the proxy. Its certificate comes from Google Trust Services. The padlock in the browser shows only that the connection is encrypted, not that the site is genuine.
If you entered a password on lilac-haven.com, change it right away on the real service and on any other account that shares it, then turn on two-factor authentication. If you submitted card or bank details, call your bank to block the card and dispute any charges. If you shared identity documents or personal details, watch for follow-up phishing that uses them to seem convincing. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and web proxies, add it to mail filtering, and report it to Cloudflare and Dynadot to speed up takedown.
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
phoenix.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
bedc96db7884a21a143f1ca69a56bc16ed740dea73a77cc16e48b485463d2bfdSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of lilac-haven.com · checked Sep 18, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
lilac-haven.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
이용 불가→접속 가능
접속 가능→이용 불가
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
이용 불가→접속 가능
접속 가능→이용 불가
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
이용 불가→접속 가능
접속 가능→이용 불가
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source14/91 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcelilac-haven.com
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
lilac-haven.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.