VirusTotal
15 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기“Křišťál Výnosta”
kristalvynosta.net — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 200). 증거 요약: VirusTotal 15/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, DNS8, ESET); Spamhaus DBL_SPAM; CF Radar malicious; PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: Dynadot.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
15 / 92 engine detections
보고서 열기악성
보고서 열기DBL_SPAM
4 community references
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
kristalvynosta.net is on the PhishDestroy blocklist and presents itself under the page title "Křišťál Výnosta", a Czech-styled name built from words for "crystal" and "yield". PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-08, and as of 2026-10-19 the site was still online, with visitors being redirected rather than shown a page directly. It has not yet been assigned a specific scheme type.
The page shows a brand-like name with no recognizable company behind it, and the wording points toward returns or yield. Sites with this kind of name are often used to collect personal details or payments, or to steer visitors to another destination. Because the domain currently redirects, the page a victim lands on can change without notice. Until the scheme is confirmed, treat any request on this site for money, login details, identity documents or a wallet connection as a potential loss.
Fifteen of 92 engines on VirusTotal flagged the domain on 2026-10-08, among them BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF and DNS8. That is a substantial number of vendors to agree on a domain this new. Spamhaus lists it in its Domain Block List under the spam category, and it appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses. Taken together, several unrelated sources have marked it as malicious.
The domain was registered through Dynadot Inc on 2026-06-19, about 16 weeks before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap suggests it was set up in advance rather than used the day it was bought. It is hosted on the Omegatech LTD network in the Netherlands and uses a standard Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the site can be trusted.
If you only visited, close the page and do not follow its redirect. If you entered a password, change it everywhere you reused it and turn on two-factor authentication. If you sent money or shared card or bank details, contact your bank straight away and keep any receipts or messages as evidence. If you connected a crypto wallet or signed anything, revoke the approvals you granted with a token-approval checker and move funds you still control to a fresh wallet. Defenders should block the domain at the DNS and proxy level and search their logs for earlier visits.
urlscan.io scan and screenshot: https://urlscan.io/result/01a11bff-2102-760a-8a3d-581afc41cfe0/
VirusTotal report: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/domain/kristalvynosta.net
Google Safe Browsing status: https://transparencyreport.google.com/safe-browsing/search?url=kristalvynosta.net
Archived copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20261009193050/https://kristalvynosta.net/
Report phishing to Google: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/
Site owner? Request a review: https://phishdestroy.io/appeals/
ns1.dyna-ns.netns2.dyna-ns.netLocation describes the IP network.
d7404a49b1409606e8b662cc4b95250676e639d6e8fafda9a80694756db38b70Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of kristalvynosta.net · checked Oct 8, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy
kristalvynosta.net
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
live_content→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
live_content→redirected
http_redirect
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
접속 가능
No threat flag
View source4 community references
View source15/92 engine detections
View sourcekristalvynosta.net
View sourcePage captured
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
kristalvynosta.net)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.