VirusTotal
16 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기“Home - KianAlexJones”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@namehero.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
kianalexjones.com — 마지막으로 알려진 활성 (HTTP 200). 사기 유형: Impersonation. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 16/89 (ADMINUSLabs, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CyRadar); URLQuery 2 alerts; PhishDestroy score 100/100. 등록기관: Key-Systems.
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
16 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기2 threat-system alerts
보고서 열기5 community references
보고서 열기provider verdict: clean
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
AI-assisted evidence review
kianalexjones.com returned HTTP status 200 during an HTTP check on 2026-10-01, indicating a successful response at that time. The domain was registered on 2025-12-08 with Key-Systems GmbH as the registrar.
A PhishDestroy internal listing for kianalexjones.com was recorded. VirusTotal reported 16 detections out of 89 scanners on 2026-09-21. OTX recorded 1 pulse on 2026-09-13. The SSL certificate scan on 2026-09-13 showed Let's Encrypt / YR2 as the issuer.
The records from PhishDestroy, OTX, and VirusTotal were each made on different dates, which means their findings reflect separate points in time. The HTTP status observed on 2026-10-01 is later than the initial OTX and SSL scan records, so comparisons should account for these timing differences between sources.
Retain all dated evidence for kianalexjones.com, including the records from PhishDestroy, OTX, VirusTotal, and the HTTP check, to facilitate future comparison. When conducting further reviews, compare new observations against these records and avoid submitting sensitive information to the domain until the evidence has been thoroughly evaluated.
ns1.namehero.comns2.namehero.comkianalexjones.compriority 0Location describes the IP network.
ac488937cadcfccefee5742b9893ae3f91c377a585f4c8369e0deb699e198961kianalexjones.com.kjwebsitesolutions.comkjwebsitesolutions.comwww.kianalexjones.com.kjwebsitesolutions.comSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of kianalexjones.com · checked Sep 13, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
kianalexjones.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
live_content→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
live_content→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
알 수 없음→protected
captcha · challenge
접속 가능
5 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source16/89 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260913-488CB6
Page captured
View sourcekianalexjones.com
View sourcePD-20260913-488CB6 Recipient: abuse@namehero.com Policy Violations: Illegal Activities: Active phishing operation targeting victims Fraud & Deception: Impersonation of legitimate services Identity Theft: Collection of credentials under false pretenses Applicable Laws (GB): Computer Misuse Act 1990 Fraud Act 2006 Communications Act 2003 - Section 127 UK law criminalizes unauthorized computer access, fraud, and malicious communications. Action Required: This evidence-backed report demonstrates clear violations requiring suspension per your policies. Continued hosting exposes your organization to regulatory scrutiny and potential legal liability.
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
kianalexjones.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.