VirusTotal
17 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기“Justo Bitline Review | Automated Trading Robot”
피싱: justo-bitline-system.com — 콘텐츠를 사용할 수 없음. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 17/89 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, CyRadar); URLQuery 5 alerts; CF…
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
17 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기5 threat-system alerts
보고서 열기악성
보고서 열기5 community references
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DigiCert UltraDNS | justo-bitline-system.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| OpenDNS | justo-bitline-system.com |
phishing | Phishing Block |
| Quad9 DNS | justo-bitline-system.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| DNS4EU | justo-bitline-system.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| Cloudflare DNS | justo-bitline-system.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
justo-bitline-system.com is an impersonation phishing page built around the name Justo Bitline. It was presented as a review of an automated trading robot and aimed at people looking for passive crypto or forex income. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-18. The site has been offline since 2026-09-26, and its DNS was still inactive at the last check on 2026-10-19.
The page title, "Justo Bitline Review | Automated Trading Robot", shows the standard lure. A page dressed up as an independent review praises a bot that supposedly trades for you, then pushes visitors to sign up and fund an account. Victims usually hand over their name, email and phone number, and are then called by "account managers" who press for a first deposit and later larger top-ups. When someone tries to withdraw, new "fees" or "taxes" appear, and money already deposited is rarely recovered. The title presents the site as a product review, while PhishDestroy classifies it as impersonation phishing.
When VirusTotal scanned the domain on 2026-09-20, 17 of 89 engines flagged it. That is a solid share for a page that had only been on our radar for two days. The detecting vendors include alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, CyRadar, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker and Fortinet. The domain also appears in five AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which shows other researchers tracked it independently. It is listed on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
The domain was registered through MainReg Inc. on 2026-01-26, about 235 days before we detected it. That gap suggests it was either kept in reserve or ran quietly before being reported. It sat behind Cloudflare, with a Canadian address, so the real origin server stayed hidden behind the proxy. Its certificate came from Google Trust Services (WE1), the kind issued automatically, so the padlock said nothing about legitimacy.
If you deposited money, contact your bank or card issuer right away to dispute the payments. Do not pay any "withdrawal fee", "tax" or "unlock charge", because these only add to the loss. Expect follow-up calls from the same people or from fake "recovery services" promising to get your funds back, and refuse them. If you shared ID documents or login details, change any reused passwords and watch for identity fraud. File a report with your national fraud authority. Defenders should block the domain and look in mail and web logs for traffic to it, especially sign-up form submissions.
Edge-IP 평판은 이 도메인에 귀속되지 않습니다.
aurora.ns.cloudflare.comkaiser.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
6f5458419f62b2edb017e836d9cee1209c542c6fa201833d50129afc9eef5e78Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of justo-bitline-system.com · checked Sep 18, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
justo-bitline-system.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
접속 가능→이용 불가
17→Observation retained
No threat flag
View source17/89 engine detections
View source5 community references
View sourcePD-20260918-941BDE
Page captured
View sourcejusto-bitline-system.com
View sourcePD-20260918-941BDE Recipient: complain@mainreg.com 계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
justo-bitline-system.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.