VirusTotal
16 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기“FASTPANEL”
피싱: just-good-enough.com — 콘텐츠를 사용할 수 없음. 증거 요약: VirusTotal 16/89 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker); URLQuery 5…
원본 포렌식 기록을 보존하기 위해 아래의 상세 PhishDestroy AI 분석은 영어로 유지됩니다.
16 / 89 engine detections
보고서 열기5 threat-system alerts
보고서 열기악성
보고서 열기5 community references
보고서 열기No threat flag
보고서 열기No malicious flag
보고서 열기Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DigiCert UltraDNS | just-good-enough.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| Quad9 DNS | just-good-enough.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| OpenDNS | just-good-enough.com |
phishing | Phishing Block |
| Cloudflare DNS | just-good-enough.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| DNS4EU | just-good-enough.com |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
just-good-enough.com is an impersonation phishing site on the PhishDestroy blocklist, built to pass itself off as a trusted service so that crypto users hand over credentials or wallet access. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-13. The site has been offline since 2026-10-14, and it was still unreachable when last checked on 2026-10-19.
Impersonation phishing copies the look of a service people already trust, such as a wallet, an exchange or a login portal. It then collects whatever the visitor types in, such as passwords, one-time codes or recovery phrases. A captured seed phrase gives the attacker the whole wallet, and stolen exchange logins let them withdraw balances. When we checked the site, the page title read "FASTPANEL", the name of a server control panel, which does not match the impersonation we classified it as.
On 2026-09-21, VirusTotal showed 16 of 89 engines flagging the domain. That is a solid minority verdict, not a fringe hit. The flagging vendors include BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Gridinsoft, alphaMountain.ai and the Vietnamese anti-scam group Chong Lua Dao. The domain also appears in five AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers have tied it to malicious activity independently of us.
The domain was registered through Namecheap on 2017-11-10, almost nine years before PhishDestroy caught it. An aged domain like this tends to pass reputation filters that throw out freshly registered names. It was hosted on the Datagear LLP network in the United States. The TLS certificate was a FASTPANEL default parking certificate, which matches the control-panel title and points to a panel-managed server, not a site with a purpose-built certificate.
If you entered a password or 2FA code on this site, change that password right away on the real service and anywhere you reused it. Then reset your two-factor setup and review recent logins and withdrawals. If you typed a seed phrase or private key, treat that wallet as compromised and move your funds to a new wallet created on a clean device. If you connected a wallet, revoke any token approvals you granted while on the site. Defenders should block the domain and its hosting IP, check proxy and DNS logs for visits between 2026-09-13 and 2026-10-14, and keep the block in place, because an aged domain like this can come back online.
ns1.stackdns.comns2.stackdns.comns3.stackdns.comns4.stackdns.commx.stackmail.compriority 10Location describes the IP network.
e5832f49569eb432933a4fe557c09c01b88082ef65d09babbbdf412b7fc0a87fSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
just-good-enough.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
접속 가능→이용 불가
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
알 수 없음→live_content
content_served
접속 가능
5 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source16/89 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260913-39002C
just-good-enough.com
View sourcePage captured
View sourcePD-20260913-39002C Recipient: abuse@namecheap.com Registrar: Namecheap Inc (United States) Policy Violations: Domain Registration Agreement prohibits hacking, misuse of domain to conduct attacks, scam and fraudulent activities; AUP allows immediate suspension Applicable Laws: CFAA 18 U.S.C. §1030, Wire Fraud 18 U.S.C. §1343, CAN-SPAM Act
계정 자격 증명, 개인 정보 또는 결제 정보를 입력했거나 이 도메인에서 파일을 다운로드한 경우 즉시 조치를 취하세요. 다음은 사건을 신고하고 자신을 보호하는 데 도움이 되는 리소스입니다.
공식 사이버 범죄 연락처 또는 불만사항 초안 작성 →를 받으려면 국가를 선택하세요.
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
just-good-enough.com)비록 모든 세부 사항을 알지 못하더라도 — 어쨌든 신고를 하세요. 부분적인 정보라도 수사에 도움이 됩니다.
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.