On 22 July 2026, the domain zoomus02web.online was observed pointing to IP 162.255.119.179, an address owned by AS22612 Namecheap, Inc. in the United States. The domain was registered on 11 July 2026 through Namecheap Inc and uses the authoritative nameservers dns1.registrar-servers.com and dns2.registrar-servers.com. The TLS certificate presented by the site is issued by Google Trust Services under the WE1 certificate authority, indicating a valid HTTPS configuration. The page title returned by the HTTP response is “www.zoomus02web.online”, and the brand target is listed as Zoom, classifying the activity as a brand‑impersonation scam.
The infrastructure has been added to three public blocklists and is actively blocked by PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL. VirusTotal reports that the domain was scanned by 91 vendors with no detections at the time of analysis; however, the absence of detections does not constitute evidence of benign intent. The site’s current HTTP status is offline, indicating that the malicious content has been taken down or the hosting has been terminated. Defenders should treat zoomus02web.online as a confirmed brand‑impersonation threat.
Network controls should block outbound connections to the resolved IP address 162.255.119.179 and any future resolution of the domain. Email security gateways should add the domain to deny lists and monitor for subject lines or URLs referencing “zoomus02web.online”. Because the domain is hosted on a shared registrar infrastructure, additional domains registered through Namecheap may appear in the same IP range; continuous monitoring of Namecheap‑associated IP blocks is advised. Threat‑intel feeds should be updated to reflect the offline status while retaining the indicator for historical correlation.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月13日score 55/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://zoomus02web.online/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:10:38 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-07-13 06:54:23 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-07-13 06:54:23 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 1,905.34hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-21 23:34:39 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
