VirusTotal
1 / 92
engines flag the domain
“Xorqevin”
1 / 92
engines flag the domain
No threat flag
Not on Google threat lists at check time
悪意あり
Browser scan with screenshot
0
threat pulses mention the domain
Online · HTTP 200
Cloudflare · 172.67.195.174 · TLS: Let's Encrypt
malicious
Each check shows its own collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety.
Aaveなりすまし: xorqevin.co — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 10/92 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet)…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
10 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く悪意あり
レポートを開く悪意あり
レポートを開く3 community references
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
xorqevin.co is a crypto impersonation phishing page that presents itself as a service called "Xorqevin". It targets cryptocurrency users who may believe they are dealing with a legitimate platform. PhishDestroy first flagged the domain on 2026-10-09. As of 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving its scam content.
Impersonation pages like this one use a polished, official-looking front, here branded "Xorqevin", to win enough trust that visitors act without checking. In crypto schemes of this kind, the page asks the victim to connect a wallet, approve a transaction, type in a recovery phrase, or send a deposit to unlock some promised feature or reward. Any of these actions can hand control of funds to the operators. On-chain transfers cannot be reversed, so whatever leaves the wallet is usually gone for good.
Our classification has outside support. On 2026-10-13, ten of 92 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain, among them BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Kaspersky, G-Data, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft and alphaMountain.ai. That is a minority of engines, but the list includes several major vendors. urlscan.io rated the page malicious and tagged it as a crypto scam. The domain also appears on the MetaMask and SEAL blocklists alongside PhishDestroy's, and three AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference it.
The domain was registered on 2026-04-11, roughly six months before we detected it. That gap suggests a name that was held in reserve or ran quietly before drawing attention. Registration goes through Cloudflare, Inc., and the site sits behind Cloudflare's network in the US, which hides the origin server. Its Let's Encrypt certificate gives the padlock icon but says nothing about whether the site can be trusted.
If you connected a wallet to xorqevin.co, review and revoke any token approvals it obtained, and move your remaining assets to a fresh wallet if you signed anything unfamiliar. If you entered a seed phrase, treat that wallet as compromised and transfer the funds to a new one immediately. Do not send further deposits or "fees" that are requested to release money, because these only add to the loss. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and proxy level, add it to wallet and email filtering, and report it to Cloudflare so the live page is taken down.
Last checked
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
betty.ns.cloudflare.comrazvan.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
ef1f879f73f062c30f2d051a5ea56c6dea91e7d71ec08b0448219a38f1b7da92Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Hostnames retained in the domain record or Certificate Transparency cache. A hostname alone does not establish current availability or malicious activity.
webapi.xorqevin.coDomain recordwww.xorqevin.coDomain recordThe original observation time is not recorded for these hostnames.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of xorqevin.co · checked Oct 9, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source10/92 engine detections
View source3 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcexorqevin.co
View source保存された類似ドメイン:95 件
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
xorqevin.co
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
xorqevin.co)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.