Cloudflare Radar
Suspicious
レポートを開く“0xprotocol: How Settlement and Trading APIs Work”
暗号資産ウォレットドレイナー: x0protocol.ink — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 0/92; Spamhaus DBL_SPAM; 2 external blocklist matches (MetaMask, SEAL)…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
Suspicious
レポートを開くDBL_SPAM
0 / 92 engine detections
レポートを開く2 community references
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
PhishDestroy has added x0protocol.ink to its internal blocklist as a suspicious domain. The recorded page title is “0xprotocol: How Settlement and Trading APIs Work”. The domain was first observed by PhishDestroy on 2026-10-21.
Because the domain is only flagged as suspicious, no concrete malicious behavior has been observed. In general, domains that imitate financial‑service terminology can be used to lure users into providing credentials, approving transactions, or downloading malicious content. Without evidence of such activity on this site, the exact tactic remains unknown.
VirusTotal reported 0 detections out of 92 engines; the scan was retrieved on 2026-10-21 and originally analyzed on 2026-10-15. Google Safe Browsing did not flag the URL when checked on 2026-10-21. Two external blocklists (MetaMask and SEAL) listed the domain as of 2026-10-21. OTX shows two pulses referencing the domain, also checked on 2026-10-21, and PhishDestroy’s internal list marks the domain as suspicious on the same date.
The domain was registered on 2026-10-15 through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. The recorded IP address is 104.21.25.22, which belongs to a content‑delivery network and does not reveal the operator’s location. No further infrastructure details are available.
Do not enter login credentials, private keys or personal data on the site. If you have already submitted such information, change the associated passwords and monitor the relevant accounts for unauthorized activity. Security teams should add x0protocol.ink to blocklists and review any logs that show connections to the recorded IP address.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
josh.ns.cloudflare.comlana.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
d72bd61c9fdf38f8fe5d8cf4c6a4d088181c471e3b9483eb5bfa141d81e7cb77*.x0protocol.inkx0protocol.inkSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of x0protocol.ink · checked Oct 21, 2026
Timestamped response metadata retained by the local collection pipeline. Each value below belongs to the displayed archive time.
http://x0protocol.ink/https://x0protocol.ink/Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8CF-Cache-Status: DYNAMICContent-Encoding: gzipServer: cloudflareh3=":443"; ma=86400DYNAMICa4dba5370993f5a6-FRAkeep-alivegziptext/html; charset=UTF-8Tue, 20 Oct 2026 23:01:36 GMT{"report_to":"cf-nel","success_fraction":0.0,"max_age":604800}strict-origin-when-cross-origin{"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800,"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=02WaCPAF2y9iJxxBFrOLLevBlOoBImx9BgT69l7VGpXU5VD4zF7AWHNdHFjvWKDsVKqDsak2Puqsh12rDOIJMQImc8jy1zjyIwvOAqT1ph7doBZcCP9oCtn6LN%2FfrA9dvA%3D%3D"}]}cloudflarechunkedAccept-Encoding0.0 CaddynosniffValues retained by the collector; long values may be shortened during collection.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
到達可能
2 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source0/92 engine detections
View sourcex0protocol.ink
View sourcePage captured
View source保存された類似ドメイン:118 件
118 件中 100 件を表示
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
x0protocol.ink
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
このドメインを操作したり、個人情報を入力したり、暗号通貨ウォレットに接続したりした場合は、直ちに行動を起こしてください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
推定では $51 billion 2024年に違法な暗号資産ウォレットへと流出した(source). もしあなたが x0protocol.ink — 今すぐ行動しましょう。
Wallet-specific steps below apply if you connected a wallet, signed a transaction, or exposed a wallet secret.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
によると、 FBI、最も重要な詳細はトランザクションデータです:
0x5856...35985)x0protocol.ink)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.