Analysis of wefab.online shows the domain was registered on February 21, 2026 via Global Domain Group LLC and is served by the nameservers dns1.lytehosting.com through dns4.lytehosting. The authoritative A record resolves to 163.61.188.5, an address allocated to AS153568 NEW DHAKA HARDWARE in the United States. No TLS certificate is presented for the host, indicating the site operates only over HTTP. The page title returned from the HTTP response is “Wells Fargo”, and the domain is classified as a banking‑phishing impersonation of the brand “base”. Intelligence feeds list the domain on one public blocklist and it is actively blocked by the PhishDestroy service. Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 out of 100.
On AlienVault OTX the domain appears in three separate pulses. VirusTotal has recorded detections from 16 of 95 scanned security vendors, confirming a high likelihood of malicious activity. The presence on a single security blocklist and the 16 vendor flags on VirusTotal align with the elevated risk rating assigned by analysts. The lack of SSL further reduces user trust and facilitates credential capture. The brand target “base” is not directly reflected in the page title, which instead references Wells Fargo, suggesting a possible attempt to lure victims seeking financial services.
The domain's short lifespan of five months indicates a rapid‑deployment tactic common to phishing kits. The domain is currently taken offline, but the underlying infrastructure – registrar, hosting provider, and IP address – remains observable. Defenders should add wefab.online and its resolved IP 163.61.188.5 to local and network‑level deny lists, ensure that any outbound connections to the AS153568 prefix are monitored, and propagate the indicators through threat‑sharing platforms. Continuous re‑evaluation is advised in case the domain is re‑registered or the IP is reused for new campaigns.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月23日score 10/1005 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://wefab.online/
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:10:26 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-06-16 22:14:04 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-06-16 22:14:04 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,538.01hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-08 19:14:29 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='wefab.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError("S
wefab.online
保存済みの結果
到達不能
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (1,116 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
Policy Violations:
Acceptable Use Policy (AUP): The domain wefab.online is engaged in phishing activities, which directly contravenes the AUP's prohibition against illegal activities, fraud, and deception.
Terms of Service (TOS): The ongoing use of wefab.online for fraudulent purposes constitutes a clear violation of the TOS, which reserves the right to suspend or terminate services for such violations.
Applicable Laws (Unknown):
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA): Prohibits unauthorized access and fraud in connection with computers and networks, applicable to phishing schemes.
Wire Fraud Statute (18 U.S.C. § 1343): Criminalizes schemes to defraud individuals or entities through electronic communications, including phishing.
CAN-SPAM Act: Regulates commercial email and prohibits misleading header information, which is often a component of phishing attacks.
Regulatory Note: Failure to take immediate action against wefab.online may result in liability under applicable laws and further regulatory scrutiny. Non-compliance could expose your organization to legal repercussions and damage your reputation.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(CA)
