Analysis of waxprime-miners.online indicates a confirmed generic phishing indicator. The domain was registered on March 11, 2026 through Global Domain Group LLC and resolves to IP address 192.142.54.88, which is allocated to Ultahost, Inc. in the Netherlands under ASN 214036. No SSL certificate is present, meaning communications are not protected by TLS. The page title returned by the server is "www.waxprime-miners.online," and the site is currently taken offline, yet historical data shows it was flagged by four of ninety‑four security vendors on VirusTotal.
It appears on a single public blocklist and is explicitly listed by PhishDestroy as a blocked resource. Nameservers dns5.fimgohost.com and dns6.fimgohost.com are authoritative for the domain. The combination of recent registration, lack of HTTPS, vendor detections, and blocklist presence establishes a heightened risk profile despite its offline status.
Uncertainty remains regarding the specific payload or credential‑harvesting mechanisms that may have been hosted, as no further content analysis is available. Defenders should continue to block the associated IP, add the domain to internal phishing and URL filtering policies, and monitor the registrar for any re‑registration activity. Network sensors should watch for traffic to the identified nameservers and IP range, and incident response teams should be prepared to investigate any future attempts to reactivate the domain or similar patterns from the same hosting provider.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月29日score 56/1003 brand signals
Submitted URLhttps://waxprime-miners.online/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:10:23 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-03-23 22:18:12 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-03-23 22:18:12 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 4,577.95hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-06-27 07:16:33 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
