Results reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
ネットワークセキュリティインテリジェンス Registrar context
Registrar contextNiceNIC
Stored registration data identifies NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED (IANA 3765) as the registrar. PhishDestroy maintains separate NiceNIC abuse-report research; registrar association is contextual and is not an independent detection for this domain.
The domain votes-billions.network has been identified as an active generic phishing threat. It does not explicitly impersonate a well-known brand but is designed to deceive users for credential harvesting or similar fraudulent purposes. The current status of this domain is active, indicating ongoing risk to potential victims.
Technical analysis reveals that votes-billions.network was registered on March 20, 2026, through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. The domain resolves to the IP address 188.114.96.3 and utilizes a Let's Encrypt SSL certificate, which may lend a false sense of security to unsuspecting users. According to VirusTotal, only 1 out of 95 security vendors currently flags this domain, suggesting it is a relatively new or emerging threat. Despite the low detection rate, the domain's recent creation date and active status contribute to an elevated risk level.
Given the elevated risk posed by votes-billions.network, users and organizations are advised to exercise caution. Avoid clicking links or submitting any personal or financial information on this domain. Security teams should consider blocking the IP 188.114.96.3 and monitoring for any related phishing campaigns. Continuous updates to detection tools and user awareness training are recommended to mitigate the risks associated with this domain.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月29日score 63/1006 brand signals
Submitted URLhttps://votes-billions.network/
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-20 02:34:17 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-05-08 23:12:22 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-08-05 01:45:38 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-05-08 23:12:22 UTC → 2026-08-05 01:45:38 UTC · 2,114.55hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-06-22 00:29:00 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 3 identified
Google Tag Manager
Tag managers
Tag management system for deploying marketing and analytics tags.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of votes-billions.network· checked Mar 25, 2026
68
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
5s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
5s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0.002
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
148ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
5s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details8
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
Outcome first observed
Observation window starts
Observation window ends
Estimated change time
Observation window · hours
2114.55
Estimate basis
Bounded by observations
Estimate precision
very_low
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='votes-billions.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnecti
votes-billions.network
保存済みの結果
到達不能
Stored observation history22
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (416 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
Registrar: NICENIC International Group Co., Limited (Hong Kong (China))
Policy Violations: “Services may be used only for lawful purposes… fraud, abuse and illegal activity prohibited. Violations may result in immediate suspension.” + dedicated abuse handling and takedown
Applicable Laws: Crimes Ordinance Cap.200 (Fraud), Theft Ordinance Cap.210 §16A (fraud by deception), Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance Cap.486
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(RU)
PhishDestroy Investigation
