The domain vote-telcoin.network was registered on March 5 2026 through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com. It resolves to 104.21.20.87, an address owned by AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc., located in the United States. The site is protected by Cloudflare and serves HTTP/3 traffic, but the only observed HTTP response is a 403 status code, indicating that the content is currently inaccessible. A Let's Encrypt certificate (E7) is present, confirming TLS termination at the edge provider. The page title returned from the server reads “Home | Telcoin”, suggesting an attempt to reference the Telcoin brand, and the listed scam type is “Wallet/Seed Phishing”.
The domain has been added to three public blocklists and is actively blocked by security products PhishDestroy, MetaMask, and SEAL. Reputation scoring is extremely low, with Gridinsoft assigning a trust score of 0 out of 100. VirusTotal analysis shows that one of ninety‑four scanning engines flagged the domain, reinforcing the suspicion of malicious intent. Nameserver records point to dilbert.ns.cloudflare.com and georgia.ns.cloudflare.com, both standard Cloudflare resolvers.
Because the site is currently offline, direct payload inspection is not possible, and the exact phishing page layout remains unknown. However, the combination of brand‑targeted page title, wallet/seed phishing classification, low trust score, blocklist presence, and a flagged detection provides strong evidence that the domain was intended to harvest cryptocurrency wallet seeds or private keys. Defenders should continue to block the domain at network perimeter, enforce DNS sinkholing for the IP address 104.21.20.87, and monitor for any future re‑registration or similar domains using the Telcoin brand. Incident response teams should also flag any attempts to resolve or contact this domain as potentially malicious and consider adding the domain to internal blocklists.
Extracted from stored page analysis
Observed indicators
0 wallet · 1 Telegram
Full extracted values, their blockchain and collection source. An address found in page content does not establish who controls it.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月23日score 15/1003 brand signals
IoC Extractionscanned 2026年8月1日0 wallet · 1 Telegram IoC
Submitted URLhttps://vote-telcoin.network/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(IN)
