VirusTotal
18 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“Best Deals”
Googleなりすまし: voreka.shop — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 18/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar, ESET); Spamhaus DBL_PHISH; CF…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
18 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く悪意あり
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
4 community references
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
voreka.shop is an impersonation phishing page presented as a discount shop titled "Best Deals." It targets people looking for bargains who trust what appears to be a legitimate retailer. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-23. It was still online and serving content on 2026-10-19. The generic "Best Deals" title points to a shopping storefront, while our classification is impersonation phishing.
Shop-style impersonation pages copy the look of a real retailer or brand and draw visitors in with prices that seem too good to pass up. At checkout or account creation, the victim types in card details, billing information, or login credentials, and all of it goes straight to the operators. The ordered goods never arrive. Stolen card data is usually charged or resold quickly, and reused passwords give the attackers access to other accounts.
On 2026-10-03, 18 of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain, including BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF and CyRadar. That spread of independent vendors makes a false positive unlikely. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL under the phishing category, which affects mail filtering and DNS-level blocking. It also appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers have tracked it independently.
The domain was registered through Namecheap, Inc. on 2026-07-01, about twelve weeks before PhishDestroy detected it. That gap is consistent with a domain held back before being used. Traffic passes through Cloudflare, Inc. on an address geolocated to Canada, which keeps the real origin server hidden from visitors. The site uses a Google Trust Services certificate, so the browser padlock only means the connection is encrypted. It says nothing about whether the shop is honest.
If you ordered from voreka.shop, contact your card issuer right away to dispute the charge and request a replacement card, then watch your statements for unfamiliar transactions. If you created an account or signed in, change that password everywhere you reused it and turn on two-factor authentication. Do not send further payments in reply to follow-up emails about "delivery" or "refunds." Defenders should block the domain at DNS, proxy and email gateways and search their logs for earlier visits.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
shubhi.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
6fea0df4f18e3a8a9298df0cf463cfb1f08e70fc2197cbd1a257f6157ff4e6edSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of voreka.shop · checked Sep 23, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=cloudflare
voreka.shop
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source18/91 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcevoreka.shop
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
voreka.shop)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.