ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@linode.com.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 1 month has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
vivo-brasil.online is a domain on the PhishDestroy blocklist. Its name pairs "vivo" with "brasil", which suggests it is aimed at Brazilian users, though no specific scheme has been confirmed. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-08-24, and it was still online and serving content on 2026-10-19. The page title reads "Service Unavailable", which does not match a site that is live and serving content. We list the domain as suspicious rather than as a specific scheme.
How the scam works
No confirmed scheme is tied to this domain yet, so the risk comes from the domain itself and the vendor verdicts. A fresh .online domain with a country-and-brand style name is the kind of address often sent through SMS, messaging apps or ads to get people to open a page and enter personal, account or payment details. A placeholder title like "Service Unavailable" tells a visitor nothing about who runs the site, so anything the site asks you to type, download or pay should be treated as untrusted.
Evidence
On 2026-09-02, VirusTotal showed 7 of 91 engines flagging the domain: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Gridinsoft, LevelBlue, SOCRadar and VIPRE. That is a minority of engines, but these are seven unrelated vendors reaching the same verdict on their own. The domain also appears in 4 AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which means other researchers have tagged it in shared threat-intelligence collections. Apart from PhishDestroy, no other blocklist lists it.
Infrastructure
The domain was registered on 2026-08-21 through GMO Internet Group (Onamae.com). It landed on our blocklist only three days later, so it was spotted almost as soon as it went live. It is hosted on Akamai Connected Cloud in Germany. Its free Let's Encrypt certificate only means the connection is encrypted and says nothing about whether the operator can be trusted.
What to do
If you opened this site from a link, do not enter anything further. If you typed a password there, change it and turn on two-factor authentication for that account and any account that shares the password. If you entered card or bank details, contact your bank to block the card and dispute unfamiliar charges, and watch for follow-up messages pretending to be your provider. Security teams should block the domain and its hosting address at DNS and proxy level, and check logs for users who visited it after 2026-08-21.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Evidence layersAvailability: Content servingContent: Content served at rootDNS: ResolvedRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observationコンテンツ公開中Ordinary HTTP content served90%2026-10-19 22:35:53 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:35:53 UTClast content: 2026-10-19 22:35:53 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
