Analysis of vegarovx.online indicates an elevated-risk crypto scam domain targeting users with a fraudulent online casino theme. The domain, registered on February 21, 2026, through NameCheap, Inc., resolves to the IP address 188.114.97.3, which is associated with Cloudflare, Inc. (AS13335) and geolocated in the United States. Infrastructure analysis reveals Cloudflare nameservers (santino.ns.cloudflare.com and zainab.ns.cloudflare.com), a configuration commonly observed in phishing campaigns to obscure hosting origins and evade takedowns. No SSL certificate is present, increasing the likelihood of interception or user distrust.
Security vendor detections are limited but notable: 14 of 93 engines on VirusTotal flagged the domain as malicious, and it appears on one security blocklist. The domain is explicitly classified as a 'Gambler Scam' phishing kit, with the page title 'Vegarovx: Most Popular Online Crypto Casino Based on Blockchain' serving as the primary indicator of its fraudulent intent. The absence of additional brand-specific targeting or login form details suggests a generic but high-risk operation designed to exploit users seeking cryptocurrency gambling platforms. Defenders should prioritize blocking this domain at the DNS and proxy levels, particularly in environments where gambling or cryptocurrency-related content is restricted.
The domain's current offline status may indicate a temporary takedown or rotation to new infrastructure, a common tactic in phishing campaigns. Monitoring for re-registration or IP shifts is recommended, alongside cross-referencing with PhishDestroy and Gridinsoft (trust score: 1/100) for updated threat intelligence. Given the lack of SSL and reliance on Cloudflare, network-level detections should focus on unencrypted traffic patterns and anomalous connections to the resolved IP.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月23日score 78/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttps://vegarovx.online/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:10:15 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-06-14 22:43:46 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-06-14 22:43:46 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 2,585.52hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-08-07 19:29:20 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='vegarovx.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionError
vegarovx.online
保存済みの結果
到達不能
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
Gridinsoft Analysis
1 / 100
(US)
