ABUSE NOTICE · 7D+ OPEN
Outgoing abuse reports are recorded; the latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable.
Notification and current-status evidence
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@velia.net.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 7 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations.
This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
The domain vasklogistics.online is identified as a generic phishing site and poses an elevated risk to users. It does not impersonate any specific brand and is currently offline. Users searching for information on whether vasklogistics.online is safe or a scam should be aware that it has been flagged as a phishing threat.
Technical indicators for vasklogistics.online include detection by 1 of 95 vendors on VirusTotal. The domain was registered through Global Domain Group LLC on March 04, 2026, and resolves to the IP address 148.72.153.160, located in the US under AS30083 velia.net. It appears on one security blocklist, specifically PhishDestroy. The SSL certificate was issued by Let's Encrypt / R13, and the site was built using technologies such as WordPress, MySQL, and Zoho. The domain's mail exchange records indicate use of Zoho mail servers.
For those who may have interacted with vasklogistics.online, it is crucial to change any passwords associated with accounts that may have been compromised and enable two-factor authentication (2FA) where possible. Users should monitor their accounts for any unauthorized transactions or activities. If phishing is suspected, it is advised to report the incident to relevant authorities or anti-phishing organizations to help mitigate further risks.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Certificate fingerprint4950c03235c5f3cc110ba65e2984a2c93e57a03d759f0622bb4a7f2954bcf25fCertificate names · 6 SANs
bentop.com.ng
fcitp.online
ghecit.online
noxmc.online
squarecashapp.com
zebraexpressdelivery.online
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Latest HTTP observationRedirectingHTTP redirect observed80%2026-10-19 22:32:55 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-10-19 22:35:39 UTC
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 12 identified
W
WordPress
CMS
Open-source CMS powering over 40% of websites worldwide.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
