VirusTotal
15 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“500 Internal Server Error”
フィッシング: urbanzio.shop — 未検証 (HTTP 409). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 15/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet); Spamhaus DBL_PHISH…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
15 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く悪意あり
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
5 community references
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
urbanzio.shop is an impersonation phishing site that poses as a legitimate brand to get visitors to trust it. PhishDestroy first saw it on 2026-09-19, and the domain was still online when we last checked it on 2026-10-19. Its page title reads "500 Internal Server Error," which does not match our impersonation classification.
Impersonation sites copy the look, name or tone of a real company so visitors act as if they were on the genuine site. Victims are typically asked to sign in, confirm account details or complete a payment. Anything typed into the page goes to the operators, including passwords, personal details and card numbers, and money paid there is lost. The server-error title may simply be what the page served at a given moment. That is why its error page should not be read as proof that the site is harmless.
On 2026-09-29, 15 of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain. The vendors included alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, G-Data, Gridinsoft and Kaspersky. That many established vendors agreeing points to a real phishing threat, not a single false positive. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL with a phishing tag, and five AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference it. PhishDestroy carries it on its own blocklist.
The domain was registered through Spaceship, Inc. on 2026-05-07, roughly four and a half months before PhishDestroy flagged it. Domains that sit unused for a while before being turned against visitors are harder for reputation systems that watch for brand-new registrations to catch. The site runs behind Cloudflare, Inc. at an address located in Canada, which hides the actual origin server. Its TLS certificate comes from Google Trust Services, so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you entered a password on urbanzio.shop, change it at once on the real service and anywhere you reused it, then turn on two-factor authentication. If you gave card or bank details or made a payment, call your bank, ask them to block the card and dispute the charge. Watch for follow-up emails or texts that refer to the order or account, since phishers often reuse stolen contact details. Security teams should block the domain at DNS and the web proxy and search logs for users who visited it after 2026-09-19. Report it to the brand it imitates once that brand is identified.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
ns1.dnsip.comns2.dnsip.comLocation describes the IP network.
b3cf8d450d4e1738b9a8f9f13e1775a75ade8ad283cee788569d366bf7a8d00dSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of urbanzio.shop · checked Sep 20, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
http_other: raw=http_409; http=409; via=http_proxy; server=cloudflare
urbanzio.shop
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
利用不可→到達可能
到達可能→利用不可
到達可能
No threat flag
View source15/91 engine detections
View source5 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourceurbanzio.shop
View sourceListed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
urbanzio.shop)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.