The domain uniswaplabz.limited was observed hosting a site that presented the page title “Bitwarder | Bitwarder Giriş | Your One-Stop Design Solution | Bitwarder”. Although the title references an unrelated service, the domain was classified as a brand‑impersonation campaign targeting Uniswap, a well‑known decentralized exchange. The site was registered through Cloudflare, Inc. and delegated to the Cloudflare name servers etienne.ns.cloudflare.com and lady.ns.cloudflare.com. No TLS certificate was found, indicating that the service was delivered over plain HTTP. DNS resolution returned the address 172.67.181.168, an IP owned by Cloudflare (AS13335) and located in the United States.
Infrastructure analysis shows that the domain relies on Cloudflare’s edge network, a common choice for malicious actors seeking anonymity and rapid provisioning. Reputation signals are poor. The Gridinsoft trust score is 0 out of 100, and the domain appears on a single security blocklist. VirusTotal reports that 12 of 95 scanning engines flagged the domain, reinforcing the suspicion of malicious intent. The site was identified as a “Crypto Scam” and has since been taken offline, with the takedown credited to the PhishDestroy blocklist.
Evidence is limited to the static metadata; the actual content of the site, including any credential‑phishing forms or malicious scripts, has not been captured. Consequently, while the branding and technical indicators strongly suggest a fraudulent campaign masquerading as Uniswap, the precise attack vector remains uncertain. Defenders should continue to block the domain at network perimeter and DNS layers, monitor for any resurgence of the host or similar Cloudflare‑issued domains, and advise users to avoid any unsolicited communications that reference Uniswap and direct traffic to uniswaplabz.limited. Ongoing vigilance is recommended, especially given the ease with which Cloudflare can provision new sub‑domains that may replicate this pattern.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月23日score 10/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://uniswaplabz.limited/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:10:26 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-05-16 18:11:46 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-05-16 18:11:46 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 3,286.05hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-24 05:13:20 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='uniswaplabz.limited', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionE
uniswaplabz.limited
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
