VirusTotal
6 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“Bitwarder | Bitwarder Giriş | Your One- Stop Design Solution | Bitwarder”
Uniswapなりすまし: uniswap-exchange.limited — 未検証. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 6/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft)…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
6 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く24 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis of uniswap-exchange.limited indicates an active high‑risk crypto‑scam infrastructure that explicitly impersonates the Uniswap brand. The domain resolves to the IP address 188.114.97.3, which is owned by AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc. and geolocated in the United States. DNS resolution is performed by the Cloudflare authoritative nameservers darwin.ns.cloudflare.com and mallory.ns.cloudflare.com, confirming that the domain was registered through Cloudflare, Inc. The web server returns an HTTP 520 status code, suggesting a Cloudflare edge‑origin communication error, but the site remains reachable and is presently blocked by the PhishDestroy blocklist. VirusTotal analysis shows that four of ninety‑five security vendors have flagged the domain, and it appears on one additional security blocklist, reinforcing the malicious assessment.
The presented SSL certificate is issued by Google Trust Services under the WE1 root, indicating a valid TLS handshake despite the underlying malicious intent. The page title returned is "Bitwarder | Bitwarder Giriş | Your One- Stop Design Solution | Bitwarder", which does not reference Uniswap and suggests possible reuse of compromised or rented infrastructure. Detected backend technologies include Apple iCloud Mail, Node.js, Express, Salesforce, Google Sign‑in, Amazon Web Services, and Stripe, all of which are typical of service‑oriented scam sites.
Gridinsoft has assigned a trust score of 0 out of 100, and the overall classification is a crypto scam targeting Uniswap users. Defenders should add the domain and its IP address to network‑level blocklists, monitor for any related C2 traffic, and enforce email and web filtering rules that reference the Uniswap brand. Continued observation is advised to detect any evolution of the payload or credential‑harvesting mechanisms that may be introduced on the site.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
darwin.ns.cloudflare.commallory.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
3563b3bce9a2508bb489f04446ee0c027023c23016e81374c94b854518ea09c7Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of uniswap-exchange.limited · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='uniswap-exchange.limited', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnec
uniswap-exchange.limited
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
4→5
No threat flag
View source24 community references
View source6/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceuniswap-exchange.limited
View source保存された類似ドメイン:79 件
コミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2025年9月28日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
uniswap-exchange.limited)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.