VirusTotal
10 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“數字民生網”
Trust Walletなりすまし: trustwallet-cn.com — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 10/89 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet)…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
10 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く2 det.
レポートを開く15/100
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
3 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
trustwallet-cn.com is an impersonation phishing site that borrows the Trust Wallet name. The "-cn" suffix suggests it was pitched as a regional or Chinese-language version of the wallet. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-23. The site has been offline since 2026-09-29 and was still dead when last checked on 2026-10-19.
Trust Wallet impersonation pages usually pose as an official support, upgrade or verification portal. They push the visitor to type in their 12- or 24-word recovery phrase or private key, or to connect the wallet and sign a request. Whoever holds that phrase controls the wallet outright, so victims typically lose every asset in it within minutes, and the transfers cannot be reversed. The page carried the Traditional Chinese title "數字民生網" (roughly "Digital Livelihood Network"), which does not reference Trust Wallet, while we classified the domain as a Trust Wallet impersonation.
Ten of 89 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain on 2026-09-23, the same day PhishDestroy listed it. The flagging engines include BitDefender, ESET, Sophos, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, Lionic and alphaMountain.ai. MetaMask's blocklist also carries it, so MetaMask users get a warning before the page loads. Spamhaus lists it in its domain blocklist under the phishing category. Three AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference it as well.
The domain was registered through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. on 2026-01-12, roughly eight months before it was detected. That gap points to a domain held in reserve or run quietly for some time rather than one used and dropped. Traffic was served through Cloudflare's network, geolocated to Canada, which hides the real origin server. The Google Trust Services certificate gave the page a normal browser padlock, a reminder that HTTPS shows nothing about a site's honesty.
If you entered your recovery phrase or private key on this site, treat the wallet as compromised. Create a new wallet with a fresh phrase and move any remaining funds to it immediately. If you only connected a wallet or signed something, review and revoke token approvals from a trusted approval-checker, and watch the address for unexpected transfers. Trust Wallet never asks for your recovery phrase, so any page that does is a scam. Defenders should keep the domain blocked even while it is down, because dormant phishing domains are often brought back. They should also check DNS and proxy logs for past visits from users who may have exposed wallets.
Last checked
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
gina.ns.cloudflare.comsage.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
7d9bf54bccb9b4843e09c19bc2182a4a0b2669412f63b05d4131a99ad03ebe91Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of trustwallet-cn.com · checked Sep 23, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
trustwallet-cn.com
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
不明→blocked
cloudflare_antiphishing · Cloudflare · phishing_interstitial
到達可能→利用不可
到達可能
No threat flag
View source3 community references
View source10/89 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260923-767FFD
trustwallet-cn.com
View sourcePage captured
View source保存された類似ドメイン:104 件
104 件中 100 件を表示
PD-20260923-767FFD Recipient: complaint@gname.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
trustwallet-cn.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.