VirusTotal
13 / 90 engine detections
レポートを開く“Trust Wallet AI 内测合伙人招募”
Trust Walletなりすまし: trust.kitchen — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 13/90 (ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, ESET); URLQuery 1 alert; URLScan…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
13 / 90 engine detections
レポートを開く1 threat-system alert
レポートを開くThreat flag recorded
レポートを開く悪意あり
レポートを開く3 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開く80/100
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quad9 DNS | trust.kitchen |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
trust.kitchen was a phishing page posing as Trust Wallet. It targeted Chinese-speaking users with a fake recruitment drive for an AI beta-testing partner program. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-02. The site has been offline since 2026-09-11, and its DNS was still inactive when we last checked on 2026-10-19.
The page title, "Trust Wallet AI 内测合伙人招募", translates to "Trust Wallet AI beta-test partner recruitment." It offers a bogus insider opportunity under a trusted wallet brand. Lures like this usually ask applicants to verify their wallet by entering a recovery phrase, connecting the wallet and signing a transaction, or paying a fee to join. Any of these hands control of the wallet, or the money, to the operators. Once a seed phrase is exposed, the attacker can empty the wallet from anywhere, and the theft cannot be reversed.
Within two days of our first sighting, 13 of 90 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain. Those included ChainPatrol, alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, ESET, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet and G-Data. Google Safe Browsing listed it under social engineering. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and matched the page to the Trust Wallet brand. The domain is blocked by PhishDestroy, MetaMask and SEAL, and three AlienVault OTX threat pulses reference it, so several independent sources reached the same conclusion.
The domain was registered on 2026-09-01 through GNAME.COM PTE. LTD. and was detected the very next day. That timing points to a throwaway domain built for a short campaign. It was hosted in Hong Kong on Forewin Telecom Group Limited's network. The site stayed online for only about ten days before going dark.
If you typed your Trust Wallet recovery phrase into this page, treat the wallet as compromised. Create a new wallet with a fresh phrase on a clean device and move any remaining funds there immediately. If you connected a wallet or signed anything, revoke the token approvals you granted using a reputable approval checker. If you paid a joining or activation fee, do not send more money to "unlock" anything, and report the payment to your exchange and local police. Trust Wallet does not recruit beta partners through standalone sites asking for seed phrases. Security teams should block the domain and watch for lookalike Trust Wallet domains using the same Chinese-language recruitment lure.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
jo.ns.cloudflare.comrene.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
到達可能→利用不可
No flag recorded→Flag recorded
到達可能
Threat flag recorded
View source13/90 engine detections
View source3 community references
View sourcePD-20260902-28779B
trust.kitchen
View sourcePage captured
View source保存された類似ドメイン:104 件
104 件中 100 件を表示
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
trust.kitchen
PD-20260902-28779B Recipient: complaint@gname.com Registrar: Gname.com Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) Policy Violations: Illegal Activities section forbids phishing, fraud, fake sites, malware distribution; registrar investigates and may suspend or delete domain Applicable Laws: Computer Misuse Act 1993 §§3+, Penal Code §§415–420 (cheating), Online Criminal Harms Act (OCHA)
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
trust.kitchen)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.