VirusTotal
14 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“403 Forbidden”
フィッシング: supershopf.vip — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 14/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar, Emsisoft); URLScan malicious…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
14 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く悪意あり
レポートを開く3 community references
レポートを開くScan report
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
supershopf.vip is a shop-branded .vip domain that PhishDestroy classifies as an impersonation phishing page. It presents itself as a legitimate service or storefront in order to collect information from people who believe they are dealing with the real thing. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-10-04. On 2026-10-19 the site was still online and serving live content.
Impersonation pages copy the look, wording and checkout or login flow of a trusted brand, then send links to victims through ads, messages or social media. Anyone who signs in, registers or pays on the copy sends their credentials, card data or money straight to the operators, with no order or service in return. At the time of review the page title read "403 Forbidden," a server error rather than a branded page, while our classification is impersonation phishing.
On 2026-10-06, VirusTotal showed 14 of 91 security engines flagging the domain. The vendors included alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar, Emsisoft, Fortinet, G-Data and Gridinsoft, a spread of independent products that supports the verdict. urlscan.io returned a malicious verdict and matched the page to a generic Cloudflare pattern rather than a specific consumer brand. The domain also appears in three AlienVault OTX threat pulses, which means other researchers have tracked it as well. It is listed on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
The domain was registered through Gname.com Pte. Ltd. on 2026-07-10, about 86 days before we detected it. That gap fits a domain that was set up in advance and later put to use. Traffic resolves to 188.114.96.1 on Cloudflare's network (AS13335, US), so the IP belongs to Cloudflare's proxy rather than the origin server. The TLS certificate comes from Google Trust Services (WE1), and the padlock it displays says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you entered a password on supershopf.vip, change it right away on the real service and on any account that uses the same password, then turn on two-factor authentication. If you gave card or bank details, call your bank, ask it to block the card and dispute any charges, and watch your statements for small test payments. Treat follow-up emails or calls about your "order" as further phishing. Defenders should block the domain at DNS, proxy and mail gateways, search logs for past visits, and report the site to Cloudflare and the registrar.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
stan.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
d56d42876c21c8e5a183d9da980fff24d5621ef878e080884696fa2aa202b9aeSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of supershopf.vip · checked Oct 5, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
No threat flag
View source14/91 engine detections
View source3 community references
View sourcesupershopf.vip
View sourceCompare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
supershopf.vip
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
supershopf.vip)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.