The domain succinict.foundation is identified as a brand impersonation threat targeting Google. Analysis confirms this domain was designed to mimic Google’s official branding, likely to deceive users into disclosing credentials or interacting with malicious content. The domain is currently offline, but prior activity indicates a deliberate attempt to exploit trust in the Google brand. Technical indicators reveal the domain was registered through Web Commerce Communications Limited on February 21, 2026, and resolved to the IP address 104.21.26.114. It was flagged by 1 of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal, while independent trust scoring platforms assigned it a score of 0/100. The domain appears on three security blocklists, including MetaMask, SEAL, and PhishDestroy. The page title explicitly displayed 'Google,' reinforcing its impersonation objective. Current status confirms the domain has been taken offline, reducing immediate risk to users. However, infrastructure analysis suggests the registrar and hosting environment may still pose residual threats. Organizations are advised to block the domain and associated IP at perimeter defenses, monitor for related domains registered through the same registrar, and educate users on recognizing brand impersonation tactics. Security teams should review logs for prior connections to 104.21.26.114 and investigate any credential submissions tied to this domain.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年4月11日score 61/1001 brand signal
Submitted URLhttp://succinict.foundation/
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:14:05 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-09-15 22:18:11 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-09-15 22:18:11 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 353.95hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-09-23 07:16:33 UTC · precision low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Last analyzed Previous stored snapshot: 1 detection
Chong Lua Dao
Gridinsoft
Registration & observation details8
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
Outcome first observed
Observation window starts
Observation window ends
Estimated change time
Observation window · hours
353.95
Estimate basis
Bounded by observations
Estimate precision
Low
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='succinict.foundation', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnection
succinict.foundation
保存済みの結果
到達不能
Stored observation history12
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Policy Violations:
Acceptable Use Policy (AUP): The domain succinict.foundation is engaged in phishing activities, which directly contravenes the AUP by facilitating deception and fraud.
Terms of Service (TOS): The registrar reserves the right to suspend or terminate services for violations, and the use of this domain for phishing constitutes a clear violation of these terms.
Applicable Laws (Unknown):
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA): This U.S. law prohibits unauthorized access to computers and networks, which is applicable to phishing schemes that deceive users into providing sensitive information.
Wire Fraud Statute (18 U.S.C. § 1343): This law criminalizes schemes to defraud individuals or entities via electronic communications, which is relevant to the activities associated with this domain.
Anti-Phishing Act: This legislation aims to combat phishing by imposing penalties on those who engage in fraudulent schemes to obtain personal information.
Regulatory Note: Failure to take immediate action against this domain may expose your organization to liability under applicable laws and regulations. Non-compliance could result in legal repercussions and damage to your reputation.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(MY)
