VirusTotal
19 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くフィッシング: stafflistings254654.info — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 19/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, Chong Lua Dao, CRDF, ESET); URLQuery 5 alerts…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
19 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く5 threat-system alerts
レポートを開くDBL_MALWARE
no community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開く80/100
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
| Detection System | Indicator | Verdict | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|
| DigiCert UltraDNS | stafflistings254654.info |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| Cloudflare DNS | stafflistings254654.info |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| DNS4EU | stafflistings254654.info |
malicious | Sinkholed |
| OpenDNS | stafflistings254654.info |
phishing | Phishing Block |
| CIRA Canadian Shield DNS | stafflistings254654.info |
malicious | Sinkholed |
PhishDestroy threat report
stafflistings254654.info is an impersonation phishing site. Its numbered, throwaway-style name points to a staff or job-listings theme. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-09-15. The site went offline on 2026-09-26, and as of 2026-10-19 its DNS no longer resolves. Anyone who received a link to it in recent months should treat that message as hostile.
Impersonation pages copy the look of a service the victim already trusts, such as a login portal, employer or listings platform. They then ask for credentials, contact details or identity documents, and everything typed into the form goes straight to the operator. When we checked, the page title read "Just a moment...", a generic loading-screen title rather than any branded content, while our analysis classified the site as impersonation phishing. Victims typically lose account access, personal data that can be reused for further fraud, or both.
On 2026-09-25, 19 of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain. That is a meaningful share for a short-lived site. The flagging vendors include BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Emsisoft, CRDF, alphaMountain.ai and Chong Lua Dao. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL under the malware category, which is independent confirmation from a reputation feed that many mail and network filters consume. PhishDestroy carries it on our blocklist.
The domain was registered on 2026-05-18 through Global Domain Group LLC, roughly four months before we detected it. That gap suggests it was registered in advance and held until the campaign went live. Traffic was fronted by Cloudflare's network, with the address geolocated to Canada, so the true origin server was not exposed. A Let's Encrypt certificate provided the padlock, which shows only that the connection was encrypted, not that the site was legitimate.
If you entered a password on this site, change it immediately on the real service and on any other account that uses the same password. Then turn on two-factor authentication and review recent sign-in activity. If you submitted ID documents, bank details or your home address, watch for follow-up contact from fake recruiters or support agents, and alert your bank or the relevant provider. Defenders should block the domain at DNS and mail gateways and search logs for clicks between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-26 to identify exposed users.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
clay.ns.cloudflare.comteagan.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
4848eab10ed759e817e52e15803b97fd37a59c7e344e5289760789314be8e321Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
stafflistings254654.info
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
到達可能→利用不可
到達可能
No threat flag
View source19/91 engine detections
View sourcePD-20260915-A4DA65
Page captured
View sourcestafflistings254654.info
View sourcePD-20260915-A4DA65 Recipient: abuse@globaldomaingroup.com アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
stafflistings254654.info)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.