PhishDestroy’s automated pipeline flagged sol-claim.online on seed 366765 for impersonating the Solana brand. The landing page displays the title “Solana Airdrop,” luring visitors with a false promise of token distribution. No drainer kit payloads were retrieved during active crawling, but the page structure suggests a classic airdrop scam workflow designed to harvest wallet credentials or prompt malicious signature requests. Registrants commonly use this template to trick Solana users into connecting wallets under the guise of receiving free tokens. The domain’s low interaction surface keeps automated detection rates artificially low, increasing the risk of successful user deception. This domain was flagged on March 20, 2026, via a NameCheap, Inc. registration and resolves to IP 64.29.17.1. VirusTotal currently shows 10/95 detections and no blocklist entries in Google Safe Browsing. The SSL certificate, issued by Let’s Encrypt, adds superficial legitimacy. Domain age is less than 24 hours at time of detection, indicating a fast-turnaround campaign likely spun up to coincide with a real Solana ecosystem event. Despite the absence of current blocklist coverage, the page’s explicit airdrop theme and Solana branding make it a high-fidelity impersonation lure. The campaign remains active with low detection fidelity. PhishDestroy has issued IOCs to industry partners and is coordinating takedown with NameCheap and Let’s Encrypt. Users should avoid visiting sol-claim.online and treat any “Solana Airdrop” solicitations with extreme skepticism. Wallet connection prompts from unknown domains should be rejected outright. Remaining risk is assessed as medium due to the domain’s freshness and low VT score, but rapid response actions are already in motion.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年7月29日score 73/1004 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://www.sol-claim.online/
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:10:27 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-05-26 22:07:57 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:26:51 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-05-26 22:07:57 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:26:51 UTC · 3,042.32hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-29 07:17:24 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
使用技術 · 2 identified
V
Vercel
PaaSCDN
Cloud platform for frontend deployment, optimized for Next.js.
H
HSTS
セキュリティ
HTTP Strict Transport Security — forces browsers to use HTTPS connections only.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of sol-claim.online· checked Mar 28, 2026
88
Needs Work
Performance
FCP
2.88s
First Contentful Paint
LCP
2.88s
Largest Contentful Paint
CLS
0
Cumulative Layout Shift
TBT
5ms
Total Blocking Time
SI
4.45s
Speed Index
Powered by Google PageSpeed Insights · Mobile strategy · Scores: 90-100 Good50-89 Needs Work0-49 Poor
Registration & observation details8
Availability observations
Last reachable observation
Outcome first observed
Observation window starts
Observation window ends
Estimated change time
Observation window · hours
3042.32
Estimate basis
Bounded by observations
Estimate precision
very_low
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='sol-claim.online', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionErro
sol-claim.online
保存済みの結果
到達不能
Stored observation history10
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
