VirusTotal
15 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“Simple swap”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@registrar.eu.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 2 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Security analysis of simpleswap.capital covers observed phishing indicators, infrastructure evidence, current status, and defensive guidance.
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
15 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
Scan report
レポートを開く4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開く80/100
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
Analysis indicates that simpleswap.capital is a recently registered domain exhibiting multiple high-risk indicators consistent with phishing activity targeting cryptocurrency users. The domain was created on July 03, 2026, through Hosting Concepts B.V. d/b/a Registrar.eu and remains active as of July 25, 2026. Infrastructure analysis reveals it resolves to the IP address 91.92.241.159, which has previously been associated with suspicious hosting environments.
The domain is currently flagged by one security vendor, PhishDestroy, and is detected by 3 of 91 security vendors on VirusTotal, suggesting early but growing recognition of its malicious nature. Nameservers ns1.metaquotes.business and ns2.metaquotes.business further link the domain to infrastructure commonly used for financial scams, particularly those involving cryptocurrency or trading platforms. While the exact content of the site has not been fully analyzed, the domain name and detection patterns strongly suggest an attempt to impersonate a legitimate cryptocurrency exchange service.
Defenders should treat this domain as high-risk and prioritize blocking or monitoring access to it. Network security teams are advised to review logs for connections to 91.92.241.159 and the associated nameservers, as well as to implement real-time blocking based on available threat intelligence feeds. No SSL certificate details or HTTP response data are currently available to confirm the site's operational status or content, but the combination of registration recency, hosting infrastructure, and early detection by security vendors warrants immediate caution.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
ns1.metaquotes.businessns2.metaquotes.businessLocation describes the IP network.
19e0dc49a08933d3c09e6bf81b983274a23e8dad928b54a6a1716db45125702bSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of simpleswap.capital · checked Jul 25, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
simpleswap.capital
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
利用不可→到達可能
到達可能→利用不可
利用不可→到達可能
到達可能→利用不可
15/91 engine detections
View source4 community references
View sourcePage captured
View sourcePD-20260725-3A5437
No threat flag
View sourcesimpleswap.capital
View sourcePD-20260725-3A5437 Recipient: abuse@registrar.eu アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
simpleswap.capital)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.