VirusTotal
15 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くフィッシング: royal.fexowin.com — 未検証. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 15/91 (alphaMountain.ai, BitDefender, CRDF, CyRadar, ESET); URLScan malicious verdict; Spamhaus DBL_PHISH…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
15 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
悪意あり
レポートを開くno community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
royal.fexowin.com is an impersonation phishing page aimed at cryptocurrency users. It sits on a "royal" subdomain of fexowin.com, and scanners tag its content as a crypto scam. PhishDestroy first detected it on 2026-09-29. As of 2026-10-19 the host still answers, but the DNS behind the scam content is inactive, so the page may no longer load.
Impersonation pages of this kind copy the look of a legitimate crypto service so visitors trust it with money or access. Victims are typically asked to log in, deposit funds or connect a wallet. Whatever they hand over goes straight to the operators. Stolen logins are reused to empty real accounts, and deposits sent to the fake service cannot be recovered. The page title shows only an ellipsis, so the page itself gives no clue to the identity it borrows.
Fifteen of 91 VirusTotal engines flagged the site as of 2026-10-01. The flagging vendors include BitDefender, ESET, Fortinet, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, G-Data, alphaMountain.ai, CRDF and CyRadar. Most of these are established security engines, which makes the result more meaningful than a single heuristic hit. urlscan.io rated the page malicious and matched it to its cryptoscam category. Spamhaus lists the domain in its DBL as phishing, and it is on the PhishDestroy blocklist.
fexowin.com was registered on 2026-07-23 through Fewmoretaps OU d/b/a Trustname.com, about two months before PhishDestroy flagged the subdomain. The site is hosted in Germany on the FEMO IT SOLUTIONS LIMITED network. It used a free Let's Encrypt certificate, so the padlock in the browser says nothing about whether the site is legitimate.
If you sent a deposit or paid any "fee" through this site, stop all further payments; operators often demand extra charges to release funds that never arrive. If you entered a password, change it everywhere you reused it and turn on two-factor authentication. If you connected a wallet or signed anything, revoke token approvals with a trusted approval checker and move remaining assets to a fresh wallet. Never share a seed phrase with any site, for any reason. Defenders should block fexowin.com and its subdomains at DNS and proxy level and check logs for past visits.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
chase.ns.cloudflare.compola.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
8a7514f9060d991617ea982ee009a40166fafd62eb091c25d55b32aac0a0f54eSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of royal.fexowin.com · checked Sep 29, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
16→15
15→16
14→15
13→14
No threat flag
View source15/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceroyal.fexowin.com
View sourceコミュニティ報告:2 件
カテゴリIMPERSONATION
There is a post circulating about a prominent online figure, Mr. Beast, promoting fexowin.com and you can easily withdraw $2,500.00 by paying $50 to verify your account. It's been going around today and it's alarming for the young Filipinos who might get scammed.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
royal.fexowin.com
“There is a post circulating about a prominent online figure, Mr. Beast, promoting fexowin.com and you can easily withdraw $2,500.00 by paying $50 to verify your account. It's been going around today and it's alarming for the young Filipinos who might get scammed.”
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
royal.fexowin.com)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.