VirusTotal
3 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開く“roit fidelity company – Online Payment Gateway & E-Wallet”
The sent-report ledger records the first outgoing report at .
The recorded recipient is abuse@velia.net.
The latest stored availability evidence still shows the domain reachable; 7 months has elapsed since the first outgoing report.
ICANN RAA §3.18 describes registrar abuse-contact and handling obligations. This section records outgoing timestamps, listed recipients, case identifiers, and later availability. It does not by itself prove receipt, acknowledgement, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
認証情報フィッシング: roitfidelitycompany.online — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 3/89 (alphaMountain.ai, Chong Lua Dao, Gridinsoft); PhishDestroy score…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
3 / 89 engine detections
レポートを開くchecked — no detections recorded
レポートを開くchecked — no match recorded
24 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
This domain, roitfidelitycompany.online, is identified as a phishing site designed to impersonate a legitimate online payment gateway. Analysis of the page title, 'roit fidelity company – Online Payment Gateway,' indicates an attempt to deceive users into entering sensitive financial or login credentials under the guise of a trusted service. No specific drainer kit signatures were detected in initial scans, but the infrastructure aligns with generic credential-harvesting phishing campaigns targeting financial institutions or payment processors. The domain does not appear to mimic a single well-known brand but instead uses a fabricated name resembling established financial entities to lend false legitimacy. Infrastructure analysis reveals the following technical indicators: the domain was registered on March 04, 2026, through Spaceship, Inc., and resolves to the IP address 148.72.153.160. VirusTotal reports 3 out of 95 security vendors flagging the domain as malicious. The domain appears on one security blocklist and is assigned a trust score of 0/100 by Gridinsoft. The site employs HTTP/3, a protocol that may be leveraged to evade detection or improve performance, though its use here does not inherently indicate malicious intent. No detections were recorded in Google Safe Browsing at the time of analysis, suggesting either recent deployment or evasion techniques. The domain is currently offline, reducing immediate risk to end users. However, the infrastructure remains registered and could be reactivated or repurposed for future phishing campaigns. Users who may have interacted with the site are advised to monitor financial accounts for unauthorized transactions and reset credentials for any services where login details may have been entered. Organizations should update blocklists to include this domain and its associated IP address. The elevated risk level is retained due to the domain's recent creation, low detection rate, and potential for reuse in targeted attacks.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
dns3.afeeshost.comLocation describes the IP network.
277f6a29eb6affdaf05f1b9f09ce568a9063520b5b614174e50da3d3f04b25e5Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=http_proxy; server=openresty/1.31.1.1
roitfidelitycompany.online
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
到達可能→利用不可
不明→live_content
content_served
2→3
2→3
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/e37b2db0-2dc9-41c8-ad60-3058c9639506
2→2
24 community references
View source3/89 engine detections
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourcePage captured
View sourceroitfidelitycompany.online
View sourcePD-20260304-96C056
コミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2026年3月4日
PD-20260304-96C056 Recipient: abuse@velia.net アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
roitfidelitycompany.online)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.