VirusTotal
6 / 90 engine detections
レポートを開く“Rhode Skin”
フィッシング: rhodeskinpetal.shop — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 6/90 (alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Gridinsoft, Netcraft, PhishFort); PhishDestroy score 73/100.…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
6 / 90 engine detections
レポートを開く4 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
rhodeskinpetal.shop presented itself under the page title "Rhode Skin", borrowing the name of the popular skincare label to look like an official or authorised storefront. Its targets were shoppers hunting for Rhode products, especially anyone chasing a discount or a sold-out item. PhishDestroy first flagged the domain on 2026-08-27. The site has been offline since 2026-09-08, its DNS no longer resolves, and it was still dead when rechecked on 2026-10-19.
Brand-impersonation shops like this copy the look and product names of a real label, then pair them with prices or bundles the genuine brand would never offer. The ".shop" domain and the word "petal" tacked onto the brand name are meant to read as a legitimate regional or promotional store. At checkout the victim enters a name, address, email and card details. The usual outcome is a charge with no product delivered, or a cheap counterfeit, and the stolen card and personal data can be reused for further fraud.
Six of 90 VirusTotal engines flagged the domain as of 2026-09-06: alphaMountain.ai, CRDF, Gridinsoft, Netcraft, PhishFort and SOCRadar. That is a modest count, but it includes vendors that specialise in phishing and brand protection, which fits a lookalike retail site better than a generic malware verdict would. The domain also appears in four AlienVault OTX threat pulses, so other researchers were tracking it independently. Among blocklists, only PhishDestroy lists it.
The domain was registered through Spaceship, Inc. and served from an address on Cloudflare, Inc.'s network, with the hosting location given as Canada. A front network like this hides the real origin server, so the visible IP says little about who ran the shop. The operation was short-lived: it went offline about twelve days after PhishDestroy first detected it. That fits disposable storefronts that rotate to fresh domains once they start getting flagged.
If you placed an order on this site, contact your card issuer right away, report the charge as fraud, and ask for the card to be cancelled and reissued. Watch your statements for small test charges, and treat follow-up emails about "delivery problems" or refunds as likely phishing. If you reused a password when creating an account there, change it wherever else you use it. Buy Rhode products only through the brand's official channels or retailers it names. Defenders should block the domain, look for other lookalike Rhode domains on new TLDs, and report fresh clones to the brand owner and the registrar.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
launch1.spaceship.netLocation describes the IP network.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
到達可能→利用不可
4→6
到達可能
4 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View source6/90 engine detections
View sourcerhodeskinpetal.shop
View sourceコミュニティ報告:1 件
カテゴリPHISHING
The PhishFort Detection System has flagged this as a domain threat, classified as null. Threat detected at 2026-08-27T15:25:48.359Z.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
rhodeskinpetal.shop
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
rhodeskinpetal.shop)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.