This domain, registered-succinct.foundation, is currently active and is flagged for involvement in an NFT scam. The domain was created on February 21, 2026, and is registered through Web Commerce Communications Limited. Infrastructure analysis reveals that the domain resolves to the IP address 104.21.96.1, which is located in the United States and is part of AS13335, operated by Cloudflare, Inc. The HTTP status code 308 suggests that the domain is being used to redirect traffic to another location, potentially masking the true destination of the scam. The SSL certificate for the domain is issued by Google Trust Services, which may lend a false sense of security to unsuspecting users. The domain appears on one security blocklist, specifically PhishDestroy, indicating that it has been identified as a threat by at least one security service. Defenders should be cautious of the high risk associated with this domain and consider implementing additional monitoring and blocking measures. Given that 10 out of 95 security vendors on VirusTotal flag this domain, there is a reasonable consensus among security tools that it poses a threat. However, the low detection rate also suggests that the domain may be evading broader detection, which underscores the need for ongoing vigilance. It is recommended that network administrators and security teams review their logs for any traffic to this domain and take appropriate action to mitigate potential risks, including educating users about the dangers of NFT scams and the importance of verifying the legitimacy of online marketplaces.
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:13:46 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-09-07 22:14:35 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-09-07 22:14:35 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 546.01hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-09-19 07:14:45 UTC · precision low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
Payment records — if you paid, save the receipt, amount, date, payment provider and recipient details.
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(MY)
