VirusTotal
2 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開く“Anoma Airdrop Registration”
偽エアドロップ: register.anoma.foundation — 最後に確認されたアクティブな状態 (HTTP 200). 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 2/91 (alphaMountain.ai, Gridinsoft); PhishDestroy score 71/100. レジストラ…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
2 / 91 engine detections
レポートを開くno community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開く14 確認済み — ブロックなし
No threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
register.anoma.foundation is an active brand‑impersonation site that mimics an airdrop registration page. The site was registered on February 21 2026 through Key‑Systems, LLC and serves content over HTTPS using a Let’s Encrypt certificate (issuer E7). The page title “Anoma Airdrop Registration” directly references the targeted brand and aligns with the observed cryptocurrency airdrop scam template. The domain resolves to 18.208.88.157, an address owned by Amazon.com, Inc. (AS14618) located in the United States. Authoritative nameservers are athena.ns.cloudflare.com and west.ns.cloudflare.com, indicating Cloudflare DNS services. Front‑end analysis shows the site is hosted on Netlify, enforces HTTP Strict Transport Security, and includes analytics from Fathom, all of which are consistent with a quickly deployed fraudulent landing page. Threat intelligence flags the domain on a single security blocklist and records it as blocked by PhishDestroy. The site employs the “Airdrop Scam” phishing kit, and Gridinsoft assigns a trust score of 0 / 100, reflecting a high likelihood of malicious intent. Despite a clean VirusTotal report (0 / 95 detections), the combination of brand impersonation, cryptocurrency lure, and low trust score warrants continued monitoring. Defenders should add register.anoma.foundation to URL filtering and DNS block lists, and monitor for any sub‑domains that resolve to the same IP range. Network traffic to the IP 18.208.88.157 should be inspected for outbound connections that could exfiltrate credentials or cryptocurrency wallets. User awareness campaigns must highlight the specific page title and the “Anoma Airdrop Registration” phrasing to reduce successful social‑engineering attempts. Ongoing intelligence collection is advised to detect potential replication of the kit on new domains.
For the registrable domain anoma.foundation behind this subdomain, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
west.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
182fd5ceafcce09a9e7a1eb7ffa4c3f78b6b35bdc6dd97267d3c38ac5cf28fccSaved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
Google PageSpeed Insights — mobile performance audit of register.anoma.foundation · checked Mar 2, 2026
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
alive_content: raw=ok; http=200; via=https_proxy; server=Netlify
register.anoma.foundation
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
不明→live_content
content_served
0→Observation retained
https://radar.cloudflare.com/scan/25aec2ec-2779-4024-9e28-b19224d2f5a6
No threat flag
View source2/91 engine detections
View sourcePage captured
View sourceregister.anoma.foundation
View sourceコミュニティの 1 人が報告・初回確認 2026年1月24日
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
register.anoma.foundation)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.