Analysis of ray-protocol.network as of 24 July 2026 indicates that the site is part of a high‑risk crypto drainer campaign targeting users of the Phantom wallet. The page title observed during collection reads "Raydium | Airdrop", which aligns with the reported fake‑airdrop lure. The infrastructure is hosted behind Cloudflare, Inc., with the domain registered through the same provider. DNS resolution points to IP 172.67.150.126, an address owned by AS13335 Cloudflare in the United States. No TLS certificate was presented, meaning the site served content over plain HTTP.
Reputation signals show the domain appears on four security blocklists and is actively blocked by PhishDestroy, Polkadot, Enkrypt, and Codeesura. AlienVault OTX includes the domain in a single threat‑intel pulse. VirusTotal analysis recorded six detections out of ninety‑five scanning engines, reinforcing the malicious classification. The nameservers in use are dimitris.ns.cloudflare.com and khloe.ns.cloudflare.com, both typical of Cloudflare‑managed domains. The observed malicious components include a Solana‑based drainer kit, identified as a "Solana Drainer", and the broader phishing kit is labeled "Airdrop Scam".
The campaign impersonates the Phantom wallet brand, attempting to lure victims into authorising transactions that transfer assets to attacker‑controlled addresses. Current status shows the domain has been taken offline, but the underlying infrastructure—particularly the Cloudflare‑proxied IP and the nameserver configuration—could be re‑used for future campaigns. Uncertainty remains regarding the exact timing of the domain’s activation and any additional payloads that may have been delivered before takedown. Defenders should continue to monitor the IP address 172.67.150.126 and the associated Cloudflare nameservers for reappearance, enforce strict URL filtering for the domain and any sub‑domains, and apply endpoint rules that block Solana transaction requests to unknown smart contracts.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年3月24日score 35/1004 brand signals
Submitted URLhttp://ray-protocol.network/
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:09:31 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-21 14:31:15 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-21 14:31:15 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 3,889.73hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-11 15:23:05 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='ray-protocol.network', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnection
ray-protocol.network
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
あなたの仮想通貨取引所 — notify its fraud team immediately; it may be able to preserve records or restrict funds held on its platform
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(US)
