Analysis on July 24, 2026 indicates that the domain ray-claims.website is currently offline and does not present an SSL certificate. The site was registered on February 21, 2026 through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com. DNS resolution points to IP address 188.114.96.3, which belongs to Cloudflare, Inc. (AS13335) and is geolocated in the United States. Both authoritative nameservers are Cloudflare‑hosted (ligia.ns.cloudflare.com and steven.ns.cloudflare.com), suggesting the attacker leveraged Cloudflare’s free DNS service to hide the true hosting environment. The page title retrieved during the brief live window was “Raydium | Airdrop”, and the domain is flagged as impersonating the “phantom” brand.
Malware analysis links the observed infrastructure to an Airdrop Scam phishing kit combined with a Solana Drainer module, categorised as a crypto‑drainer scam. The domain appears on a single security blocklist and has been actively blocked by PhishDestroy. Independent scanning on VirusTotal recorded detections by three of ninety‑five AV engines, reinforcing the malicious classification. Gridinsoft assigned a trust score of 0 out of 100, indicating a high confidence of abuse.
While the site is no longer reachable, the combination of a recent registration date, Cloudflare‑based DNS, lack of TLS, and the presence of known drainer code strongly suggest purposeful use for illicit Solana wallet harvesting. The limited number of blocklist entries may reflect rapid takedown or low exposure. Defenders should continue to monitor the IP address 188.114.96.3 for any resurgence of the payload, enforce outbound transaction filtering for Solana addresses, and add ray-claims.website to internal deny lists. Because the registrar does not provide rapid takedown mechanisms, threat‑intel sharing with sink‑hole services and coordination with Cloudflare abuse teams is recommended to accelerate remediation.
DOM Analysisanalyzed 2026年3月24日score 35/1004 brand signals
Submitted URLhttps://ray-claims.website/
ケース ID
ICANN OVERSIGHT
認定と RAA の背景
Registrar accreditation and DNS abuse obligations
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
Accreditation is a contract, not a safety certification.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Primary outcomeDNS 非アクティブreason: DNS NXDOMAIN80% confidence
Attributionsource: Dns Cache
Evidence layersAvailability: DNS inactiveContent: UnreachableDNS: NXDOMAINRegistration: Unknown
Latest HTTP observation不明Probe Inconclusive20%2026-10-19 01:09:31 UTC
RDAP registration不明
Observed timelinelast reachable: 2026-04-22 04:25:15 UTCcurrent episode first observed: 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTCobserved RIP window: 2026-04-22 04:25:15 UTC → 2026-09-30 16:14:55 UTC · 3,875.83hmidpoint estimate ≈ 2026-07-11 22:20:05 UTC · precision very low · basis bounded
Availability, content, DNS and registration are independent evidence layers. NXDOMAIN, an unreachable origin or missing content alone does not prove registrar action. A registrar or provider is credited only when a direct technical marker identifies that actor. Report causality is shown separately.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Check for cloaking
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
No cloaking flag in this check
unavailable: raw=connection_error; http=0; via=http_proxy; error=SOCKSHTTPConnectionPool(host='ray-claims.website', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: / (Caused by NewConnectionEr
ray-claims.website
Stored observation history11
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
PDF notice generated Notice text archived (1,225 chars)
Abuse notice text as sent to the provider
Policy Violations:
Acceptable Use Policy (AUP): The domain ray-claims.website is engaged in phishing activities, which directly contravenes the AUP's prohibition against illegal activities and fraud.
Terms of Service (TOS): The registrar reserves the right to suspend or terminate services for violations, and the ongoing use of this domain for deceptive practices warrants immediate action under this provision.
Applicable Laws (US):
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) - 18 U.S.C. § 1030: This law prohibits unauthorized access to computers and networks, which is applicable as phishing schemes often involve deception to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information.
CAN-SPAM Act - 15 U.S.C. § 7701: This act regulates commercial email and prohibits misleading headers and deceptive subject lines, both of which are common in phishing attempts.
Wire Fraud - 18 U.S.C. § 1343: Phishing schemes often involve the use of electronic communications to defraud individuals, constituting wire fraud under this statute.
Regulatory Note: Failure to act on this report may expose your organization to legal liability and regulatory scrutiny. Immediate compliance with your AUP and TOS is imperative to mitigate potential risks.
あなたの仮想通貨取引所 — notify its fraud team immediately; it may be able to preserve records or restrict funds held on its platform
Your bank or payment provider — contact its fraud team promptly through official contact details if money or card information was exposed.
地元の警察 — たとえ直ちに行動を起こせなくても、公式な記録が残される
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
詐欺による金銭の返還を装った詐欺 — fraudsters pose as recovery agents and demand upfront fees. Never share a seed phrase or pay before independently verifying the provider
About this reportSources, observation dates and corrections
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.
(IN)
