VirusTotal
5 / 90 engine detections
レポートを開く“Suspected Phishing | Cloudflare”
MetaMaskなりすまし: proposal-linera.xyz — コンテンツが利用できません. 証拠の概要: VirusTotal 5/90 (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft, SOCRadar)…
元のフォレンジック記録を保持するため、下の PhishDestroy AI 詳細分析は英語のままです。
5 / 90 engine detections
レポートを開くDBL_PHISH
3 community references
レポートを開くprovider verdict: clean
レポートを開く80/100
レポートを開くNo threat flag
レポートを開くNo malicious flag
レポートを開くResults reflect each source’s collection time. Zero detections do not guarantee safety. OTX references are community publications.
PhishDestroy threat report
proposal-linera.xyz is an impersonation phishing site that borrows the name of Linera, a blockchain project, and frames itself as a "proposal" page aimed at that community's token holders and wallet users. PhishDestroy first flagged it on 2026-08-22. The site went offline on 2026-08-26, and by 2026-10-19 its DNS no longer resolved, so the domain is currently dead.
Lures built around a project "proposal" usually present a fake governance vote, airdrop eligibility check or claim page, then ask the visitor to connect a wallet to take part. Once connected, the page requests a signature or token approval that hands control of the victim's assets to the attacker, or prompts for a recovery phrase outright. The most recent page title on the domain was Cloudflare's "Suspected Phishing" interstitial, a warning screen rather than the original Linera-themed content we classified.
Three wallet-security blocklists carry the domain: PhishDestroy, MetaMask and SEAL, the last two of which protect crypto users directly at the wallet and community level. Spamhaus lists it in its domain blocklist under the phishing category. On VirusTotal, 5 of 90 engines flag it (alphaMountain.ai, Forcepoint ThreatSeeker, Fortinet, Gridinsoft and SOCRadar, as of 2026-09-04). That is a modest count, but it lines up with the wallet-focused lists and with three AlienVault OTX threat pulses referencing the domain.
The domain sits on the cheap, disposable .xyz extension and was registered through Spaceship, Inc. It was served through Cloudflare's network, with the address geolocating to Canada, which reflects Cloudflare's edge rather than the operator's location. The site stayed reachable only about four days after PhishDestroy detected it, a short lifespan typical of campaigns that rotate lookalike domains rather than defend a single one.
If you connected a wallet to this site, open a token-approval manager and revoke any permissions granted around 2026-08-22 to 2026-08-26, then check recent transactions for unexpected transfers. If you typed in a recovery phrase or private key, treat that wallet as compromised and move remaining assets to a new wallet created with a fresh seed. Only follow Linera proposals or claims announced through the project's official channels, never links from DMs or replies. Defenders should keep the domain blocked and watch for new registrations pairing "linera" with words like proposal, vote, claim or airdrop.
Last checked
For this gTLD, the registrar above operates under an ICANN accreditation agreement. The links below provide the official fee schedule and current DNS abuse compliance guidance.
RAA §3.18 establishes abuse-contact and handling requirements. This report can document stored outbound notices and later technical observations; it does not by itself establish receipt, investigation, remediation, or contractual non-compliance.
Edge-IP の評判はこのドメインに起因しません。
stanley.ns.cloudflare.comLocation describes the IP network.
2eb48d71ccf4e1855303786065d83d1a7d511af3ea35d4611c38647dd52101e0Saved certificate metadata. Certificate dates without a timezone are shown as stored. Transport encryption does not establish that the site is trustworthy.
An estimated time describes an observation window. It does not prove a registrar action or the exact moment a site became unavailable.
Dated changes retained by the monitor and source collectors. Newest observations appear first; source states are not proof of a takedown.
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
不明→dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
dns_inactive
dns_nxdomain
利用不可→到達可能
0→2
到達可能→利用不可
到達可能
5/90 engine detections
View source3 community references
View sourceNo threat flag
View sourceproposal-linera.xyz
View source保存された類似ドメイン:79 件
Compare what a browser and a crawler receive, and check for Keitaro traffic routing.
proposal-linera.xyz
Listed domains receive at least one abuse report; this entry has no retained notification history.
アカウント資格情報、個人情報、支払い情報を入力した場合、またはこのドメインからファイルをダウンロードした場合は、すぐに対処してください。インシデントを報告し、自分自身を守るのに役立つリソースを以下に示します。
サイバー犯罪の公式連絡先 または 苦情草稿を作成する → を取得するには、国を選択してください。
Template-based draft · optional AI wording assistance requires separate consent
Choose the steps that match what you shared. Keep a copy of this report alongside your own records.
Stop using the suspicious site. Open the real service through its official app or an address you already trust.
Keep original emails, receipts, messages and screenshots in a secure place. A factual timeline helps the receiving authority understand what happened. IC3 evidence guidance ↗
proposal-linera.xyz)たとえすべての詳細がわかっていなくても―― とにかく報告を提出する. 不完全な情報であっても、捜査には役立つ。
A report is not a guarantee of recovery or investigation, but prompt, accurate transaction data can help authorities and service providers trace the incident.
Further guidance: NIST · phishing responseFBI IC3 · reports & evidenceFTC · recovery scams
保存されたブロックリスト、WHOIS、DNS、および公開スキャン証拠を使用した脅威分析
今すぐスキャン不審なドメインを当社の脅威データベースに報告してください — コミュニティを守りましょう
レポート最近のフィッシングレポートと観察された可用性の変化
監視リアルタイムの脅威を監視するか、誤検知だと思われる場合はこのリストに異議を申し立ててください
This report combines saved page captures, registration and network records, scanner results and PhishDestroy reporting history. Each source keeps its own observation date. Open a source report to inspect the original result.
The AI-assisted analysis was written on . It describes the evidence available at that time; later source checks can change.
A capture documents what was shown. A scanner result records that provider’s assessment at the time of its check. Neither a valid certificate nor a zero-detection result is a guarantee of safety.